DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Hampton National Bank v. Desjardins, 314 A.2d 654.

16 citing documents.

  • In Re State Employees'ass'n of Nh 939 A.2d 209 N.H. 2007
    v. Town of Northumberland, 149 N.H. 728, 729-30 (2003); Hampton Nat’l Bank v. Desjardins, 114 N.H. 68, 73 (1974).
  • Lee James Enterprises, Inc. v. Town of Northumberland 829 A.2d 644 N.H. 2003
    Hampton Nat’l Bank v. Desjardins, 114 N.H. 68, 73 (1974).
  • Estate of Ireland v. Worcester Insurance 826 A.2d 577 N.H. 2003
    Opinion of the Justices, 131 N.H. 644, 650 (1989); Hampton Nat’l Bank v. Desjardins, 114 N.H. 68, 75 (1974).
  • Heron Cove Ass'n v. DVMD Holdings, Inc. 769 A.2d 373 N.H. 2001
    Finally, because our holding today does not establish a new principle of law overruling clear past precedent, see Hampton Nat’l Bank v. Desjardins, 114 N.H. 68, 75 (1974), we decline to apply it only prospectively.
  • First NH Bank v. Town of Windham 639 A.2d 1089 N.H. 1994
    Opinion of the Justices, 131 N.H. at 649-51, 557 A.2d at 1368-69; Hampton Nat’l Bank v. Desjardins, 114 N.H. 68, 314 A.2d 654 (1974); see also Harper v. Virginia Dept. of Taxation, 113 S. Ct. 2510 (1993).
  • Orleans v. Commercial Union Insurance 578 A.2d 360 N.H. 1990
    *495 In Hampton National Bank v. Desjardins, 114 N.H. 68, 314 A.2d 654 (1974), we referred to a three-part test applied by the Supreme Court of the United States in its cases dealing with the question of retroactivity.
  • Taylor v. Nutting 578 A.2d 347 N.H. 1990
    Hampton Nat’l Bank v. Desjardins, 114 N.H. 68, 75, 314 A.2d 654, 658 (1974); Madbury v. Durham, 108 N.H. 479 -80, 240 A.2d 760, 764 (1968).
  • Hall v. Tibert 567 A.2d 593 N.H. 1989
    The decision in Rounds is one such instance since it does not overrule an established precedent upon which litigants relied, see Burns v. Bradley, 120 N.H. 542, 545, 419 A.2d 1069, 1071 (1980); Hampton Nat’l Bank v. Desjardins, 114 N.H. 68, 74-75, 314 A.2d 654, 658 (1974); Merrill v. Manchester, 114 N.H. 722, 729-30, 332 A.2d 378, 383-84 (1974); Vickers v. Vickers, 109 N.H. 69, 70-71, 242 A.2d 57, 58 (1968), and since retroactive application of Rounds would not result in inequitable consequences
  • Opinion of the Justices 557 A.2d 1364 N.H. 1989
    In reaching this opinion, we rely on the reasoning in our decision in Hampton Nat’l Bank v. Desjardins, 114 N.H. 68, 314 A.2d 654 (1974).
  • Stanley v. Walsh 517 A.2d 1189 N.H. 1986
    As we held in Waid v. Ford Motor Company, 125 N.H. 640, 641, 484 A.2d 1152, 1153 (1984) and Hampton National Bank v. Desjardins, 114 N.H. 68, 73, 314 A.2d 654, 657 (1974), it is the general common law rule that appellate decisions in civil cases operate retroactively.
  • Waid v. Ford Motor Co. 484 A.2d 1152 N.H. 1984
    Hampton Nat’l Bank v. Desjardins, 114 N.H. 68, 73, 314 A.2d 654, 657 (1974) (citing Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618, 622-23 (1965)).
  • Sindt v. Gilfoyle 469 A.2d 1334 N.H. 1983
    Hampton Nat’l Bank v. Desjardins, 114 N.H 68, 314 A.2d 654 (1974).
  • Zivic v. Place 451 A.2d 960 N.H. 1982
    Hampton Nat’l Bank v. Desjardins, 114 N.H. 68, 73, 314 A.2d 654, 657-58 (1974).
  • Alexander v. Orford School District 377 A.2d 127 N.H. 1977
    Merrill v. Manchester, 114 N.H. 722, 730, 332 A.2d 378, 382 (1974); Hampton Nat’l Bank v. Desjardins, 114 N.H. 68, 73-75, 314 A.2d 654, 657-58 (1974); Madbury v. Durham, 108 N.H. 474, 240 A.2d 760 (1968).
  • United American Insurance v. Whaland 337 A.2d 358 N.H. 1975
    Hampton Nat’l Bank v. Desjardins, 114 N.H. 68, 314 A.2d 654 (1974); Bell v. Burson, 402 U.S. 535 (1971); Jordan v. United Ins.
  • Merrill v. City of Manchester 332 A.2d 378 N.H. 1974
    Hampton Nat’l Bank v. Desjardins, 114 N.H. 68, 314 A.2d 654 (1974); Hurley v. Hudson, 112 N.H. 365, 368, 296 A.2d 905, 907 (1972); Holytz v. Milwaukee, 17 Wis.