Cited by

ICS Communications v. Fitch, 145 N.H. 433, 434-35 (2000); see also Opinion of the Justices, 113 N.H. 205, 214 (1973); Copp v. Henniker, 55 N.H. 179, 202-03 (1875); cf. Opinion of the Justices (DWI Jury Trials), 135 N.H. 538, 541-42 (1992) (explaining that Part I, Article 15 of the State Constitution guarantees 7 We did not have occasion to consider whether the de novo appeal provision required a trial by jury as a matte

Opinion of the Justices, 113 N.H. 205, 214, 304 A.2d 881, 887 (1973) (“[J]ury trial need not be had in the first instance if a reasonably unfettered right of appeal is *435 allowed to a court where the constitutional right of trial by jury can be enjoyed.”).

Opinion of the Justices, 113 N.H. 205, 210, 304 A.2d 881, 885 (1973).

Opinion of the Justices, 113 N.H. 205, 210, 304 A.2d 881, 885 (1973).

Opinion of the Justices, 113 N.H. 205, 214, 304 A.2d 881, 887 (1973).

Opinion of the Justices, 113 N.H. 205, 212-13, 304 A.2d 881, 886-87 (1973).

Our answers must necessarily be limited to the constitutional issues raised by your inquiries.” Opinion of the Jus *267 tices, 113 N.H. 205, 209, 304 A.2d 881, 884 (1973).

or character; to obtain right and justice freely, without being obliged to purchase it; completely, and without any denial; promptly, and without delay; conformably to the laws.” “As indicated in Article 14 the remedies provided are to be provided ‘conformably to the laws.’ This means the rules of statutory and common law applicable at the time the injury is sustained.” Opinion of the Justices, 113 N.H. 205, 210, 304 A.2d 881, 885 (1973).

that [the limit] is so severe as to be ‘very wide of any reasonable line of demarcation.’ ” Estate of Cargill v. City of Rochester, 119 N.H. at 669, 406 A.2d at 708 (1979) (quoting Opinion of the Justices, 113 N.H. 205, 213, 304 A.2d 881, 887 (1973)).

Opinion of the Justices, 113 N.H. 205, 212, 304 A.2d 881, 886 (1972).

Opinion of the Justices, 113 N.H. 205, 213, 304 A.2d 881, 887 (1973); State v. Moore, supra at 21-22, 13 A.2d at 147-48.

This court has held that the rights guaranteed by part I, article 14 “are necessarily relative.” Sousa v. State, 115 N.H. 340, 343, 341 A.2d 282, 284 (1975); Opinion of the Justices, 113 N.H. 205, 209, 304 A.2d 881, 885 (1973).

“This means the rules of statutory and common law applicable at the time the injury is sustained.” Opinion of the Justices, 113 N.H. 205, 210, 304 A.2d 881, 885 (1973).

We indicated in Opinion of the Justices, 113 N.H. 205, 210, 304 A.2d 881, 885 (1973), that these rights are necessarily relative.