Cited by
Opinions in New Hampshire that cite State v. Moreau, 306 A.2d 764.
-
State of New Hampshire v. Richard A. Germain
N.H. 2018
“[S]earch warrants must describe with particularity the area to be searched and the things to be seized.” State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 308 (1973).
-
Distinguished
State v. Dowman
855 A.2d 524
N.H. 2004
at 1016 (quotation omitted); see also State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 306 (1973).
-
State v. Cannuli
722 A.2d 450
N.H. 1998
Although we have previously acknowledged that “probable cause springing from specific facts diminishes with the passage of time,” State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 307, 306 A.2d 764, 767 (1973), we have never held that probable cause must be supplemented in all circumstances with current information.
-
State v. Stiles
512 A.2d 1084
N.H. 1986
RSA 318-B:26, 11(a); see State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 305-06, 306 A.2d 764, 765-66 (1973).
- State v. Cote 493 A.2d 1170 N.H. 1985
-
State v. Andrews
480 A.2d 889
N.H. 1984
Although “probable cause springing from specific facts diminishes with the passage of time,” State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 307, 306 A.2d 764, 767 (1973), other current facts may be presented in the affidavit to establish the probable continuing occurrence of criminal activity sustaining information that would otherwise be characterized as stale.
-
State v. Sands
467 A.2d 202
N.H. 1983
State v. Doe, 115 N.H. at 684, 371 A.2d at 168; State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 307, 306 A.2d 764, 766 (1973).
-
State v. Spero
371 A.2d 1155
N.H. 1977
State v. Mandravelis, 114 N.H. 634, 637, 325 A.2d 794, 796 (1974); State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 307, 306 A.2d 764, 766 (1973); Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410, 416 (1969); Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 114 (1964).
-
State v. Breest
367 A.2d 1320
N.H. 1976
in Massachusetts as well as in New Hampshire that “[t]he sufficiency of the affidavit is to be decided on the basis of a consideration of all of its allegations as a whole, and not by first dissecting it and then subjecting each resulting fragment to a hypertechnical test of its sufficiency standing alone.” Commonwealth v. Stewart, 358 Mass. 747, 751, 267 N.E.2d 213, 216 (1971); State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 307, 306 A.2d 764, 766 (1973).
-
State v. Thorp
358 A.2d 655
N.H. 1976
at 413; Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 114 (1964); State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 307, 306 A.2d 764, 766 (1973); see State v. Mandravelis, 114 N.H. 634, 637, 325 A.2d 794, 796 (1974).
-
State v. Doe
371 A.2d 167
N.H. 1975
State v. Titus, 107 N.H. 215, 220 A.2d 154 (1966); State v. Salsman, 112 N.H. 138, 290 A.2d 618 (1972); State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 306 A.2d 764 (1973).
-
State v. St. Germain
325 A.2d 803
N.H. 1974
In order to meet the requirement for specificity in a search warrant (State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 306 A.2d 764 (1973)), the police would have had to gamble that the heroin was either in the car or the apartment.
-
State v. Dearborn
322 A.2d 924
N.H. 1974
RSA 595-A:2 (Supp. 1972); Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 114 (1964); accord, United States v. Harris, 403 U.S. 573, 577-80 (1971); State v. Nickerson, 114 N.H. 47, 49-50, 314 A.2d 648, 650 (1974); State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 307-08, 306 A.2d 764, 766 (1973).
-
State v. Comeau
321 A.2d 590
N.H. 1974
United States v. Harris, 403 U.S. 573, 577-80 (1971); State v. Nickerson, 114 N.H. 47, 50, 314 A.2d 648, 650 (1974); State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 307, 306 A.2d 764, 766 (1973); Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257, 270 (1960).
-
State v. Nickerson
314 A.2d 648
N.H. 1974
Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 114 (1964); Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410, 413 (1969); accord, United States v. Harris, 403 U.S. 573, 577-80 (1971); State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 307, 306 A.2d 764, 766 (1973).