Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite State v. Moreau, 306 A.2d 764.

15 citing documents.

  • State of New Hampshire v. Richard A. Germain N.H. 2018
    “[S]earch warrants must describe with particularity the area to be searched and the things to be seized.” State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 308 (1973).
  • Distinguished State v. Dowman 855 A.2d 524 N.H. 2004
    at 1016 (quotation omitted); see also State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 306 (1973).
  • State v. Cannuli 722 A.2d 450 N.H. 1998
    Although we have previously acknowledged that “probable cause springing from specific facts diminishes with the passage of time,” State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 307, 306 A.2d 764, 767 (1973), we have never held that probable cause must be supplemented in all circumstances with current information.
  • State v. Stiles 512 A.2d 1084 N.H. 1986
    RSA 318-B:26, 11(a); see State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 305-06, 306 A.2d 764, 765-66 (1973).
  • State v. Cote 493 A.2d 1170 N.H. 1985
  • State v. Andrews 480 A.2d 889 N.H. 1984
    Although “probable cause springing from specific facts diminishes with the passage of time,” State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 307, 306 A.2d 764, 767 (1973), other current facts may be presented in the affidavit to establish the probable continuing occurrence of criminal activity sustaining information that would otherwise be characterized as stale.
  • State v. Sands 467 A.2d 202 N.H. 1983
    State v. Doe, 115 N.H. at 684, 371 A.2d at 168; State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 307, 306 A.2d 764, 766 (1973).
  • State v. Spero 371 A.2d 1155 N.H. 1977
    State v. Mandravelis, 114 N.H. 634, 637, 325 A.2d 794, 796 (1974); State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 307, 306 A.2d 764, 766 (1973); Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410, 416 (1969); Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 114 (1964).
  • State v. Breest 367 A.2d 1320 N.H. 1976
    in Massachusetts as well as in New Hampshire that “[t]he sufficiency of the affidavit is to be decided on the basis of a consideration of all of its allegations as a whole, and not by first dissecting it and then subjecting each resulting fragment to a hypertechnical test of its sufficiency standing alone.” Commonwealth v. Stewart, 358 Mass. 747, 751, 267 N.E.2d 213, 216 (1971); State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 307, 306 A.2d 764, 766 (1973).
  • State v. Thorp 358 A.2d 655 N.H. 1976
    at 413; Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 114 (1964); State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 307, 306 A.2d 764, 766 (1973); see State v. Mandravelis, 114 N.H. 634, 637, 325 A.2d 794, 796 (1974).
  • State v. Doe 371 A.2d 167 N.H. 1975
    State v. Titus, 107 N.H. 215, 220 A.2d 154 (1966); State v. Salsman, 112 N.H. 138, 290 A.2d 618 (1972); State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 306 A.2d 764 (1973).
  • State v. St. Germain 325 A.2d 803 N.H. 1974
    In order to meet the requirement for specificity in a search warrant (State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 306 A.2d 764 (1973)), the police would have had to gamble that the heroin was either in the car or the apartment.
  • State v. Dearborn 322 A.2d 924 N.H. 1974
    RSA 595-A:2 (Supp. 1972); Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 114 (1964); accord, United States v. Harris, 403 U.S. 573, 577-80 (1971); State v. Nickerson, 114 N.H. 47, 49-50, 314 A.2d 648, 650 (1974); State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 307-08, 306 A.2d 764, 766 (1973).
  • State v. Comeau 321 A.2d 590 N.H. 1974
    United States v. Harris, 403 U.S. 573, 577-80 (1971); State v. Nickerson, 114 N.H. 47, 50, 314 A.2d 648, 650 (1974); State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 307, 306 A.2d 764, 766 (1973); Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257, 270 (1960).
  • State v. Nickerson 314 A.2d 648 N.H. 1974
    Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 114 (1964); Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410, 413 (1969); accord, United States v. Harris, 403 U.S. 573, 577-80 (1971); State v. Moreau, 113 N.H. 303, 307, 306 A.2d 764, 766 (1973).