DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite LaBonte v. National Gypsum Co., 269 A.2d 634.

21 citing documents.

  • Appeal of Griffin 671 A.2d 541 N.H. 1996
    Kidder argues that this case is controlled by LaBonte v. National Gypsum Co., 110 N.H. 314, 269 A.2d 634 (1970), and Newell v. Moreau, 94 N.H. 439, 55 A.2d 476 (1947), in which we looked at the nature of the quarrel between co-workers to determine whether benefits were recoverable.
  • Opinion of the Justices 641 A.2d 1012 N.H. 1994
    LaBonte v. Nat’l Gypsum Co., 110 N.H. 314, 316, 269 A.2d 634, 636 (1970).
  • Day v. New Hampshire Retirement System 635 A.2d 493 N.H. 1993
    LaBonte v. Nat’l Gypsum Co., 110 N.H. 314, 316, 269 A.2d 634, 636 (1970).
  • Young v. Prevue Products, Inc. 534 A.2d 714 N.H. 1987
    In LaBonte v. National Gypsum Co., 110 N.H. 314, 319, 269 A.2d 634, 638 (1970), this court interpreted RSA 281:12 as barring only an employee’s right of action at common law, not an employee’s wife’s statutory right of action for loss of consortium.
  • Bean v. Miller 448 A.2d 424 N.H. 1982
    LaBonte v. Nat’l Gypsum Co., 110 N.H. 314, 318-19, 269 A.2d 634, 637-38 (1970); see Reid v. Spadone Mach.
  • Kingsbury v. Smith 442 A.2d 1003 N.H. 1982
    Co., 119 N.H. 198, 199, 400 A.2d 54, 54-55 (1979); *244 LaBonte v. Nat’l Gypsum Co., 110 N.H. 314, 318-19, 269 A.2d 634, 637-38 (1970).
  • Kenneth E. Curran, Inc. v. Auclair Transportation, Inc. 431 A.2d 124 N.H. 1981
    Co., 118 N.H. 607, 610, 392 A.2d 576, 578 (1978); accord Evans v. Hall, 118 N.H. 920, 921, 396 A.2d 334, 335 (1980); LaBonte v. Nat’l Gypsum Co., 110 N.H. 314, 316, 269 A.2d 634, 636 (1970).
  • Donnelly v. Kearsarge Telephone Co. 428 A.2d 888 N.H. 1981
    Heinz v. Concord Union School Dist., 117 N.H. 214, 217, 371 A.2d 1161, 1163 (1977); LaBonte v. Nat’l Gypsum Co., 110 N.H. 314, 317, 269 A.2d 634, 636 (1970).
  • City of Portsmouth v. Meaney 426 A.2d 21 N.H. 1981
    generally LaBonte v. Nat’l Gypsum Co., 110 N.H. 314, 317, 269 A.2d 634, 636 (1970); Walter v. Hagianis, 97 N.H. 314, 317, 87 A.2d 154, 157 (1952); 1B A. Larson, The Law of Workmen’s Compensation §§ 42.00-42.24 (1980).
  • Evans v. Hall 396 A.2d 334 N.H. 1978
    LaBonte v. National Gypsum Co., 110 N.H. 314, 269 A.2d 634 (1970).
  • Stevens v. Lewis 387 A.2d 637 N.H. 1978
    Gypsum Co., 110 N.H. 314, 269 A.2d 634 (1970) and Ransmeier v. Camp Cody, Inc., 117 N.H. 736, 378 A.2d 752 (1977).
  • Heinz v. Concord Union School District 371 A.2d 1161 N.H. 1977
    The injury must result from “‘the conditions and obligations of the employment’ and not merely from the ‘bare existence of the employment.’ ” Labonte v. Nat’l Gypsum Co., 110 N.H. 314, 317, 269 A.2d 634, 636 (1970).
  • O'Keefe v. Associated Grocers of New England, Inc. 370 A.2d 261 N.H. 1977
    In LaBonte v. National Gypsum Co., 110 N.H. 314, 269 A.2d 634 (1970), we held that a wife’s right to sue for loss of consortium is separate and distinct from her husband’s rights against his employer to recover for the injuries he sustains.
  • William H. Field Co. v. Nuroco Woodwork, Inc. 348 A.2d 716 N.H. 1975
    LaBonte v. Nat’l Gypsum Co., 110 N.H. 314, 269 A.2d 634 (1970).
  • American Asbestos Textile Corp. v. American Mutual Liability Insurance 330 A.2d 451 N.H. 1974
    Guevin v. Railway, 78 N.H. 289, 99 A. 298 (1916); LaBonte v. National Gypsum Co., 110 N.H. 314, 319, 269 A.2d 634, 638 (1970); see RSA 507:8-a.
  • Seaman v. Berry 322 A.2d 922 N.H. 1974
    Labonte v. National Gypsum Co., 113 N.H. 678, 682, 313 A.2d 403, 406 (1973); Labonte v. National Gypsum Co., 110 N.H. 314, 318, 269 A.2d 634, 637 (1970).
  • LaBonte v. National Gypsum Co. 313 A.2d 403 N.H. 1973
    Grimes, J. This is an action to recover for loss of consortium (LaBonte v. Nat’l Gypsum Co., 110 N.H. 314, 269 A.2d 634 (1970)) arising out of an injury to plaintiff’s husband, William, when he was intentionally struck by a fellow employee while in the employ of the defendant.
  • Morin v. J. H. Valliere Co. 309 A.2d 153 N.H. 1973
    LaBonte v. National Gypsum Co., 110 N.H. 314, 316, 269 A.2d 634, 636 (1970); K. Davis, Administrative Law Text § 18.02 (1972); 3 A. Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law § 79.71, at 222 (1971).
  • City of Manchester v. Huard 301 A.2d 719 N.H. 1973
    Assaults caused by or resulting from working conditions or the conditions and obligations of employment are compensable under the statutory language “arising out of and in the course of employment.” RSA 281:2 V (Supp. 1972); Newell v. Moreau, 94 N.H. 439, 55 A.2d 476 (1947); LaBonte v. National Gypsum Company, 110 N.H. 314, 269 A.2d 634 (1970).
  • Archie v. Hampton 287 A.2d 622 N.H. 1972
    969), this court held that “[t]he statute did not give the wife merely a new remedy to an existing right but gave her a new cause of action previously denied.” This new cause of action “is a separate and distinct right from that of her husband to recover for her separate and distinct loss of consortium which results to her from the negligent injury to her husband.” LaBonte v. National Gypsum Co., 110 N.H. 314, 319, 269 A.2d 634, 638 (1970).
  • Brooks v. Legasse Amusement Co. 276 A.2d 480 N.H. 1971
    As was said in the more recent case of Labonte v. National Gypsum Company, 110 N.H. 314, 318, 269 A.2d 634, 637 (1970); “Plaintiff, being conclusively presumed to have accepted the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law *128 (RSA 281:12(supp.)), cannot maintain an action at common law against his employer for his injury.