DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Peter Salvucci & Sons, Inc. v. State, 268 A.2d 899.

16 citing documents.

  • Phillips v. Verax Corp. 637 A.2d 906 N.H. 1994
    Peter Salvucci & Sons, Inc. v. State, 110 N.H. 136, 154, 268 A.2d 899, 911 (1970).
  • Palazzi Corp. v. Stickney 619 A.2d 1001 N.H. 1992
    Palazzi cites Peter Salvucci & Sons Inc. v. State, 110 N.H. 136, 154, 268 A.2d 899, 911 (1970), for the proposition that “[t]he use of a formula.
  • R. Zoppo Co. v. City of Dover 475 A.2d 12 N.H. 1984
    Such additional compensation cannot be awarded for ‘it is a basic rule of contract law that one who has contracted to do a thing for a stated price will not be entitled to extra compensation on account of encountering difficulties which have not been provided against in the contract.’ Salvucci v. State, [ 110 N.H. 136, 147, 268 A.2d 899, 906 (1970)].” Zoppo argues that in relying on Salvucci, the master erred as a matter of law inasmuch as the master’s ruling ignores the equitable adjustment cla
  • M. W. Goodell Construction Co. v. Monadnock Skating Club, Inc. 429 A.2d 329 N.H. 1981
    Peter *324 Salvucci & Sons Inc. v. State, 110 N.H. 136, 154, 268 A.2d 899, 911 (1970)).
  • Progressive Survey, Inc. v. Pearson 410 A.2d 1123 N.H. 1980
    Peter Salvucci & Sons, Inc. v. State, 110 N.H. 136, 154-55, 268 A.2d 899, 911 (1970).
  • Erin Food Services, Inc. v. 688 Properties 401 A.2d 201 N.H. 1979
    “[T]he proper interpretation of a contract is that which will make it speak the intention of the parties at the time it was made.” Ass’n of Portsmouth Teachers v. Portsmouth School Dist., 113 N.H. 659, 661 312 A.2d 573, 575 (1973) quoting Peter Salvucci & Sons, Inc. v. State, 110 N.H. 136, 144, 268 A.2d 899, 905 (1970).
  • King v. Thomson 400 A.2d 1169 N.H. 1979
    Peter Salvucci & Sons, Inc. v. State, 110 N.H. 136, 268 A.2d 899 (1970); RSA 491:8.
  • Emery v. Caledonia Sand and Gravel Co. 374 A.2d 929 N.H. 1977
    Inc., 110 N.H. 215, 218, 265 A.2d 5, 8 (1970); Salvucci & Sons Inc. v. State, 110 N.H. 136, 154, 268 A.2d 899, 911 (1970); Coos Lumber Co. v. Builders Supply Co., 104 N.H. 404, 406, 188 A.2d 330, 331 (1963).
  • Marcou Construction Co. v. Tinkham Industrial & Development Corp. 371 A.2d 1187 N.H. 1977
    Peter Salvucci & Sons, Inc. v. State, 110 N.H. 136, 268 A.2d 899 (1970).
  • Paras v. City of Portsmouth 335 A.2d 304 N.H. 1975
    RSA 76:16-a (Supp. 1973); Opinion of the Justices, 87 N.H. 492, 179 A. 357 (1935); Manchester v. Boston & Maine R.R., 98 N.H. 52, 94 A.2d 552 (1953); Peter Salvucci & Sons, Inc. v. State, 110 N.H. 136, 155-56, 268 A.2d 899, 911-12 (1970), aff'd, 111 N.H. 259, 281 A.2d 164 (1971).
  • Dove v. Knox Mountain Corp. 319 A.2d 640 N.H. 1974
    The transcript shows there was evidence to support the referee’s findings and the credibility of the various witnesses presented factual matters for the trier of facts “which, when supported by the evidence, must be upheld on appeal.” Amodeo v. Allen, 94 N.H. 370, 371, 54 A.2d 363, 364 (1947); see Peter Salvucci & Sons, Inc. v. State, 110 N.H. 136, 155, 268 A.2d 899, 911 (1970); Atherton v. Concord, 109 N.H. 164, 166, 245 A.2d 387, 389 (1968).
  • Ass'n of Portsmouth Teachers v. Portsmouth School District 312 A.2d 573 N.H. 1973
    It is well established “that the proper interpretation of a contract is that which will make it speak the intention of the parties at the time it was made.” Peter Salvucci & Sons, Inc. v. State, 110 N.H. 136, 144, 268 A.2d 899, 905 (1970); Griswold v. Heat Corporation, 108 N.H. 119, 229 A.2d 183 *662 (1967).
  • Vitic v. New England Mortgage Investment Corp. 283 A.2d 490 N.H. 1971
    Salvucci & Sons, Inc. v. State, 110 N.H. 136, 154, 268 A.2d 899, 911 (1970).
  • State v. Peter Salvucci & Sons, Inc. 281 A.2d 164 N.H. 1971
    Peter Salvucci & Sons, Inc. v. State, 110 N.H. 136, 268 A.2d 899 (1970).
  • State v. Peter Salvucci & Sons, Inc. 272 A.2d 854 N.H. 1970
    Lampron, J. Petition for a writ of certiorari filed by the State as an original proceeding in this court (RSA 490:4) praying to have reopened the case of Peter Salvucci & Sons, Inc. v. State, 110 N.H. 136, 268 A.2d 899 (1970), in order to have considered the issue of whether or not the State has to pay interest and costs on a verdict rendered against it by the superior court.
  • J. Dunn & Sons, Inc. v. Paragon Homes of New England, Inc. 265 A.2d 5 N.H. 1970
    ” Southwestern Trans Co. v. Durham, 102 N. H. 169, 173, 152 A.2d 596; Peter Salvucci & Sons, Inc. v. State, 110 N. H. 136, 268 A.2d 899.