Cited by
Opinions in New Hampshire that cite State v. Petkus, 269 A.2d 123.
-
State v. Jeleniewski
791 A.2d 188
N.H. 2002
The assistance of counsel is provided at critical stages of criminal proceedings in order to preserve a defendant’s right to a fair trial.
- State v. Nielsen 530 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
State v. Delisle
630 A.2d 767
N.H. 1993
The assistance of counsel is provided at critical stages of criminal proceedings in order to preserve a defendant’s right to a fair trial.
-
State v. McAdams
594 A.2d 1273
N.H. 1991
This rule, “grounded in common sense and judicial economy,” Johnson supra, gives the trial court an opportunity to “consider alleged errors and to take remedial measures when necessary,” State v. Kelly, 120 N.H. 904, 905, 424 A.2d 820, 821 (1980), including, in its discretion, allowing a party to reopen evidence, State v. Petkus, 110 N.H. 394, 398, 269 A.2d 123, 125 (1970), cert.
-
State v. Symonds
556 A.2d 1175
N.H. 1989
California v. Trombetta, 467 U.S. at 491; State v. Greene, 128 N.H. at 320, 512 A.2d at 432; State v. Petkus, 110 N.H. 394, 397, 269 A.2d 123, 125 (1970), cert.
- State v. Juarez 775 P.2d 1140 Ariz. 1989
- Kunzler v. Pima County Superior Court 744 P.2d 669 Ariz. 1987
- Kunzler v. Miller 744 P.2d 671 Ariz. 1987
-
State v. Greene
512 A.2d 429
N.H. 1986
We have held that the advice of counsel is not constitutionally required when a person has to make a choice concerning the taking of a blood alcohol content test under the implied consent law.
-
State v. Crockett
358 A.2d 414
N.H. 1976
The trial court did not err in granting the prosecution’s motion to amend the complaint (State v. Green, 105 N.H. 260, 197 A.2d 204 (1964); Commonwealth v. Jervis, 335 N.E.2d 356 (Mass. 1975); RSA 601:8; Annot., 14 A.L.R.3d 1335 (1967)) or in granting its motion to reopen its case.
-
State v. Booton
329 A.2d 376
N.H. 1974
State v. Streeter, 113 N.H. 402, 403, 308 A.2d 535, 536 (1973); State v. Petkus, 110 N.H. 394, 398, 269 A.2d 123, 125 (1970); State v. Comparone, 110 N.H. 398, 399, 269 A.2d 131, 132 (1970).
-
State v. Morin
327 A.2d 702
N.H. 1974
State v. Comparone, 110 N.H. 398, 269 A.2d 131 (1970); State v. Petkus, 110 N.H. 394, 269 A.2d 123 (1970).
-
State v. Martineau
324 A.2d 718
N.H. 1974
“It is the rule in criminal cases that the trial court in the exercise of sound discretion may reopen a case for the purpose of admitting testimony in behalf of either the prosecution or the defense.” State v. Comparone, 110 N.H. 398, 399, 269 A.2d 131, 132 (1970); State v. Streeter, 113 N.H. 402, 403, 308 A.2d 535, 536 (1973); State v. Petkus, 110 N.H. 394, 397-98, 269 A.2d 123, 125 (1970).
-
State v. Moody
319 A.2d 105
N.H. 1974
State v. Comparone, 110 N.H. 398, 269 A.2d 131 (1970); State v. Petkus, 110 N.H. 394, 269 A.2d 123 (1970).
-
Overruled
State v. Streeter
308 A.2d 535
N.H. 1973
State v. Petkus, 110 N.H. 394, 269 A.2d 123 (1970); State v. Comparone, 110 N.H. 398, 269 A.2d 131 (1970).
-
Harlan v. State
308 A.2d 856
N.H. 1973
In State v. Petkus, 110 N.H. 394, 269 A.2d 123 (1970), we ruled that the taking of a blood sample under the implied consent law is not a critical stage of a criminal proceeding requiring the assistance of counsel under the sixth and fourteenth amendments.
-
State v. Dunsmore
297 A.2d 230
N.H. 1972
State v. Petkus, 110 N.H. 394, 269 A.2d 123 (1970); cf. RSA 594:15, 16, 17, requiring that notice of detention of a prisoner be given to a relative, friend, or attorney of the prisoner, and that conferences at reasonable times be permitted, under penalty of a fine.
- Campbell v. Superior Court 479 P.2d 685 Ariz. 1971
-
State v. Comparone
269 A.2d 131
N.H. 1970
State v. Petkus, 110 N.H. 394, 269 A.2d 123; United States v. Glass, 421 F.2d 832, 833 (9th Cir. 1969); Annot., 87 A.L.R.2d 849, 851.