Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite State v. Petkus, 269 A.2d 123.

19 citing documents.

  • State v. Jeleniewski 791 A.2d 188 N.H. 2002
    The assistance of counsel is provided at critical stages of criminal proceedings in order to preserve a defendant’s right to a fair trial.
  • State v. Nielsen 530 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • State v. Delisle 630 A.2d 767 N.H. 1993
    The assistance of counsel is provided at critical stages of criminal proceedings in order to preserve a defendant’s right to a fair trial.
  • State v. McAdams 594 A.2d 1273 N.H. 1991
    This rule, “grounded in common sense and judicial economy,” Johnson supra, gives the trial court an opportunity to “consider alleged errors and to take remedial measures when necessary,” State v. Kelly, 120 N.H. 904, 905, 424 A.2d 820, 821 (1980), including, in its discretion, allowing a party to reopen evidence, State v. Petkus, 110 N.H. 394, 398, 269 A.2d 123, 125 (1970), cert.
  • State v. Symonds 556 A.2d 1175 N.H. 1989
    California v. Trombetta, 467 U.S. at 491; State v. Greene, 128 N.H. at 320, 512 A.2d at 432; State v. Petkus, 110 N.H. 394, 397, 269 A.2d 123, 125 (1970), cert.
  • State v. Juarez 775 P.2d 1140 Ariz. 1989
  • Kunzler v. Pima County Superior Court 744 P.2d 669 Ariz. 1987
  • Kunzler v. Miller 744 P.2d 671 Ariz. 1987
  • State v. Greene 512 A.2d 429 N.H. 1986
    We have held that the advice of counsel is not constitutionally required when a person has to make a choice concerning the taking of a blood alcohol content test under the implied consent law.
  • State v. Crockett 358 A.2d 414 N.H. 1976
    The trial court did not err in granting the prosecution’s motion to amend the complaint (State v. Green, 105 N.H. 260, 197 A.2d 204 (1964); Commonwealth v. Jervis, 335 N.E.2d 356 (Mass. 1975); RSA 601:8; Annot., 14 A.L.R.3d 1335 (1967)) or in granting its motion to reopen its case.
  • State v. Booton 329 A.2d 376 N.H. 1974
    State v. Streeter, 113 N.H. 402, 403, 308 A.2d 535, 536 (1973); State v. Petkus, 110 N.H. 394, 398, 269 A.2d 123, 125 (1970); State v. Comparone, 110 N.H. 398, 399, 269 A.2d 131, 132 (1970).
  • State v. Morin 327 A.2d 702 N.H. 1974
    State v. Comparone, 110 N.H. 398, 269 A.2d 131 (1970); State v. Petkus, 110 N.H. 394, 269 A.2d 123 (1970).
  • State v. Martineau 324 A.2d 718 N.H. 1974
    “It is the rule in criminal cases that the trial court in the exercise of sound discretion may reopen a case for the purpose of admitting testimony in behalf of either the prosecution or the defense.” State v. Comparone, 110 N.H. 398, 399, 269 A.2d 131, 132 (1970); State v. Streeter, 113 N.H. 402, 403, 308 A.2d 535, 536 (1973); State v. Petkus, 110 N.H. 394, 397-98, 269 A.2d 123, 125 (1970).
  • State v. Moody 319 A.2d 105 N.H. 1974
    State v. Comparone, 110 N.H. 398, 269 A.2d 131 (1970); State v. Petkus, 110 N.H. 394, 269 A.2d 123 (1970).
  • Overruled State v. Streeter 308 A.2d 535 N.H. 1973
    State v. Petkus, 110 N.H. 394, 269 A.2d 123 (1970); State v. Comparone, 110 N.H. 398, 269 A.2d 131 (1970).
  • Harlan v. State 308 A.2d 856 N.H. 1973
    In State v. Petkus, 110 N.H. 394, 269 A.2d 123 (1970), we ruled that the taking of a blood sample under the implied consent law is not a critical stage of a criminal proceeding requiring the assistance of counsel under the sixth and fourteenth amendments.
  • State v. Dunsmore 297 A.2d 230 N.H. 1972
    State v. Petkus, 110 N.H. 394, 269 A.2d 123 (1970); cf. RSA 594:15, 16, 17, requiring that notice of detention of a prisoner be given to a relative, friend, or attorney of the prisoner, and that conferences at reasonable times be permitted, under penalty of a fine.
  • Campbell v. Superior Court 479 P.2d 685 Ariz. 1971
  • State v. Comparone 269 A.2d 131 N.H. 1970
    State v. Petkus, 110 N.H. 394, 269 A.2d 123; United States v. Glass, 421 F.2d 832, 833 (9th Cir. 1969); Annot., 87 A.L.R.2d 849, 851.