Cited by
Opinions in New Hampshire that cite J. Dunn & Sons, Inc. v. Paragon Homes of New England, Inc., 265 A.2d 5.
-
GRAND SUMMIT HOTEL CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS' ASSOCIATION v. L.B.O. HOLDING, INC. D/B/A Attitash Mountain Resort
195 A.3d 514
N.H. 2018
Dunn & Sons, Inc. v. Paragon Homes of New Eng., Inc., 110 N.H. 215, 217 (1970); Genesco, Inc. v. T. Kakiuchi & Co., Ltd., 815 F.2d 840, 846 (2d Cir. 1987).
-
John A. Cookson Co. v. New Hampshire Ball Bearings, Inc.
787 A.2d 858
N.H. 2001
Dunn & Sons, Inc. v. Paragon Homes of New Eng., Inc., 110 N.H. 215, 217 (1970).
-
Lakeview Homeowners Ass'n v. Moulton Construction, Inc.
693 A.2d 87
N.H. 1997
Works & Highways, 136 N.H. 202, 204, 612 A.2d 1326, 1328 (1992), and we have suggested that a lack of precision in pleadings may be cured by information obtained in pretrial discovery, see Dunn & Sons, Inc. v. Paragon Homes of New Eng., Inc., 110 N.H. 215, 218, 265 A.2d 5, 8 (1970).
-
Ellis v. Robert C. Morris, Inc.
513 A.2d 951
N.H. 1986
Co., 118 N.H. 607, 613, 392 A.2d 576, 580 (1978); Dunn & Sons, Inc. v. Paragon Homes of New Eng., Inc., 110 N.H. 215, 217, 265 A.2d 5, 8 (1970).
-
Kantor v. Norwood Group, Inc.
508 A.2d 1078
N.H. 1986
In evaluating the substance of a particular action, we will consider four factors: “[t]he source or origin of the duty alleged to have been violated; the nature of the grievance; the character of the remedy such facts indicate; [and] the type of damages sought.” Guerin, supra at 505, 418 A.2d at 227 (quoting Dunn & Sons, Inc. v. Paragon Homes of New Eng., Inc., 110 N.H. 215, 217, 265 A.2d 5, 7 (1970)).
-
Demers Nursing Home, Inc. v. R. C. Foss & Son, Inc.
449 A.2d 1231
N.H. 1982
Dunn & Sons, Inc. v. Paragon Homes of New Eng., Inc., 110 N.H. 215, 217, 265 A.2d 5, 7 (1970); see also Murphy v. Doll-Mar, Inc., 120 N.H. 610, 611, 419 A.2d 1106, 1108 (1980).
-
Young v. Abalene Pest Control Services, Inc.
444 A.2d 514
N.H. 1982
Whether an action is “on a contract or in tort is not controlled by the form of the action but by its substance.” Dunn & Sons, Inc. v. Paragon Homes of New Eng., Inc., 110 N.H. 215, 217, 265 A.2d 5, 7 (1970); see Guerin v. N.H. Catholic Charities, 120 N.H. 501, 505, 418 A.2d 224, 227 (1980).
-
Pittsfield Weaving Co. v. Grove Textiles, Inc.
430 A.2d 638
N.H. 1981
Dunn & Sons, Inc. v. Paragon Homes of New Eng., Inc., 110 N.H. 215, 216-17, 265 A.2d 5, 7 (1970).
-
Guerin v. New Hampshire Catholic Charities, Inc.
418 A.2d 224
N.H. 1980
In making such a determination, we examine four factors: “[t]he source or origin of the duty alleged to have been violated; the nature of the grievance; the character of the remedy such facts indicate; [and] the type of damages sought.” J. Dunn & Sons, Inc. v. Paragon Homes of New Eng., Inc., 110 N.H. 215, 217, 265 A.2d 5, 7 (1970); 1 Am.
-
Lawton v. Great Southwest Fire Insurance
392 A.2d 576
N.H. 1978
Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co., 114 N.H. 130, 134, 316 A.2d 549, 552 (1974); Dunn & Sons, Inc. v. Paragon Homes of New England, Inc., 110 N.H. 215, 218, 265 A.2d 5, 8 (1970).
-
Emery v. Caledonia Sand and Gravel Co.
374 A.2d 929
N.H. 1977
Inc., 110 N.H. 215, 218, 265 A.2d 5, 8 (1970); Salvucci & Sons Inc. v. State, 110 N.H. 136, 154, 268 A.2d 899, 911 (1970); Coos Lumber Co. v. Builders Supply Co., 104 N.H. 404, 406, 188 A.2d 330, 331 (1963).
-
D. Latchis, Inc. v. Borofsky Bros., Inc.
343 A.2d 637
N.H. 1975
Dunn & Sons, Inc. v. Paragon Homes of New Eng., Inc., 110 N.H. 215, 265 A.2d 5 (1970); Association of Portsmouth Teachers v. Portsmouth School Dist., 113 N.H. 659, 312 A.2d 573 (1973); Foley v. Foley, 149 Conn. 469, 470-72, 181 A.2d 607, 608-09 (1962); 73 Am.
-
Clark v. Exeter Co-Operative Bank
344 A.2d 5
N.H. 1975
Dunn & Sons, Inc. v. Paragon Homes of New Eng., Inc., 110 N.H. 215, 217, 265 A.2d 5, 7 (1970); Madbury v. State, 115 N.H. 196, 340 A.2d 103 (1975).
-
Towns of Madbury v. State
340 A.2d 103
N.H. 1975
Ordinarily, plaintiffs have broad freedom in electing which form of action to proceed on, but “the determination of whether an action is on a contract or in tort is not controlled by the form of action, but by its substance.” Dunn & Sons Inc. v. Paragon Homes of New Eng., Inc., 110 N.H. 215, 217, 265 A.2d 5, 7 (1970).
-
Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.
316 A.2d 549
N.H. 1974
Dunn & Sons, Inc. v. Paragon Homes of New Eng., Inc., 110 N.H. 215, 218, 265 A.2d 5 (1970); Francoeur v. Stephen, 97 N.H. 80, 81 A.2d 308 (1951); Johnson v. Waisman Bros., 93 N.H. 133, 36 A.2d 634 (1944).
-
Jamestown Mutual Insurance v. Meehan
312 A.2d 689
N.H. 1973
Dunn & Sons, Inc. v. Paragon Homes of New England, Inc., 110 N.H. 215, 219, 265 A.2d 5, 8 (1970).
-
Town of Derry v. DiOrio
308 A.2d 523
N.H. 1973
Roberts v. Richard 7 Sons, Inc., 113 N.H. 154, 304 A.2d 364 (1973); Dunn & Sons Inc. v. Paragon Homes of New England, Inc., 110 N.H. 213, 217, 265 A.2d 5, 7 (1970).
-
Roberts v. Richard & Sons, Inc.
304 A.2d 364
N.H. 1973
“The determination of whether an action is on a contract or tort is not controlled by the form of the action but by its substance.” Dunn & Sons, Inc. v. Paragon Homes of New England, Inc., 110 N.H. 215, 217, 265 A.2d 5, 7 (1970); Cloutier v. Kasheta, 105 N.H. 262, 197 A.2d 627 (1964); Lakeman v. LaFrance supra.
-
Sibson v. State
282 A.2d 664
N.H. 1971
” J. Dunn & Sons, Inc., v. Paragon Homes of New Eng., Inc., 110 N.H. 215, 217, 265 A.2d 5, 7 (1970).