DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Allen v. State, 260 A.2d 454.

13 citing documents.

  • Gagnon v. Crane 498 A.2d 718 N.H. 1985
    Allen v. State, 110 N.H. 42, 47, 260 A.2d 454, 458 (1969); Remillard v. New Eng.
  • Fletcher v. Kunze 480 A.2d 141 N.H. 1984
    Once the jury has been fully instructed on the law of the case and the theories of the parties, it is within the discretion of the court to determine the extent to which the law is given specific application to the parties’ theories.
  • Belleau v. Hopewell 411 A.2d 456 N.H. 1980
    Kennedy v. Ricker supra; Allen v. State, 110 N.H. 42, 260 A.2d 454 (1969).
  • Kennedy v. Ricker 409 A.2d 778 N.H. 1979
    Once the applicable law has been set out along with each party’s claims, further instructions are in the trial court’s discretion.
  • Blais v. Town of Goffstown 406 A.2d 295 N.H. 1979
    generally Allen v. State, 110 N.H. 42, 48, 260 A.2d 454, 459 (1969); Lafferty v. Houlihan, 81 N.H. 67, 121 A. 92 (1923).
  • London v. Perreault 387 A.2d 342 N.H. 1978
    Because the allegations and testimony make reference to acts contemporaneous with the alleged emergency, the court properly instructed the jury that the possibility that the defendant was acting under the stress of an emergency not created by his own negligence is a factor to be considered in determining whether he acted with ordinary care.
  • Wieszeck v. Sepessy 355 A.2d 865 N.H. 1976
    The challenged instruction is virtually identical to the one given in Remillard v. New England Telephone Co., 115 N.H. 702, 349 A.2d 588 (1975), and is defective for the reason there stated: It may have conveyed to the jury the erroneous conception that a person cannot act negligently in an emergency.
  • Remillard v. New England Telephone Co. 349 A.2d 588 N.H. 1975
    ."Allen v. State, 110 N.H. 42, 47, 260 A.2d 454, 458 (1969); see Kardasinski v. Koford, 88 N.H. 444, 446-47, 190 A. 702, 703 (1937).
  • Hodgdon v. Gallagher 325 A.2d 792 N.H. 1974
  • Poulin v. Provost 319 A.2d 296 N.H. 1974
    It is well-established law that the trial court’s charge must be examined and judged as a whole.
  • Donato v. Boutin 314 A.2d 677 N.H. 1974
    Allen v. State, 110 N.H. 42, 45, 260 A.2d 454, 457 (1969); Dane v. MacGregor, 94 N.H. 294, 299, 52 A.2d 290, 293 (1947); Colby v. Lee, 83 N.H. 303, 307, 142 A. 688 (1928).
  • Loney Ex Rel. Towle v. Parsons 284 A.2d 910 N.H. 1971
    Defendant contends that the court erred in not instructing the jury on the instinctive action part of the emergency doctrine.
  • Parker v. J. W. Simoneau & Sons Realty Corp. 279 A.2d 599 N.H. 1971
    ” This instruction correctly stated the law and left it as a matter of fact for the jury to determine whether plaintiff’s condition was such as to make it unreasonable for the defendant to assume careful conduct on the part of the plaintiff.