Cited by
Opinions in New Hampshire that cite State v. Gallant, 227 A.2d 597.
-
State v. Jean Claude Mfataneza
210 A.3d 874
N.H. 2019
Stated differently, “[t]he major premise of the implied consent law is 3 that it will aid the prosecution of the guilty and the protection of the innocent.” State v. Gallant, 108 N.H. 72, 76 (1967) (quotation omitted).
-
State v. Taylor
566 A.2d 172
N.H. 1989
The fact that the test was administered approximately one hour and fifteen minutes after the defendant’s operation of the motor vehicle, however, goes to the weight to be accorded to the test by the trier of fact.
-
State v. Brodeur
493 A.2d 1134
N.H. 1985
Scientific tests for intoxication should be no less trustworthy than the views of untrained laymen who have always been permitted to testify as to intoxication on the basis of sight, smell, speech and locomotion.” State v. Roberts, 102 N.H. 414, 416, 158 A.2d 458, 460 (1960); State v. Gallant, 108 N.H. 72, 75, 227 A.2d 597, 599 (1967); State v. Kupetz, 115 N.H. 722, 723, 350 A.2d 335, 336 (1975).
-
State v. Martin
484 A.2d 1176
N.H. 1984
Subject to such controls as will ensure reliable results, State v. Gallant, 108 N.H. 72, 227 A.2d 597 (1967); RSA 265:85 (Supp. 1983), the tests are administered at the direction of a law enforcement officer.
-
State v. Wong
486 A.2d 262
N.H. 1984
*626 We have long recognized that any delay between the occurrence of an event and the examination of blood alcohol content goes to the weight of the evidence and not to its admissibility.
-
State v. Wheeler
416 A.2d 1384
N.H. 1980
“[EJvidence having any tendency, however slight, to prove a particular fact is competent proof of the fact.” Mason v. Railway, 79 N.H. 300, 303, 109 A. 841, 843 (1919); Curtis v. Laconia Car Co. Works, 73 N.H. 516, 63 A. 400 (1906); see State v. Gallant, 108 N.H. 72, 227 A.2d 597 (1967).
-
State v. Van Wie
382 A.2d 372
N.H. 1978
This court has interpreted RSA 262-A: 69-i to hold that its provisions are mandatory and not permissive, State v. Gallant, 108 N.H. 72, 76, 227 A.2d 597, 599 (1967), and impose upon the director an affirmative obligation to promulgate satisfactory methods.
-
State v. Varney
370 A.2d 289
N.H. 1977
State v. Gallant, 108 N.H. 72, 73-75, 227 A.2d 597, 598-99 (1967); State v. LaFountain, 108 N.H. 219, 231 A.2d 635 (1967).
-
State v. Kupetz
350 A.2d 335
N.H. 1975
While blood tests are not administered except in conformity with the mandatory requirements of RSA 262-A:69-i (Supp. 1975) (See State v. Gillis, 114 N.H. 417, 321 A.2d 576 (1974); State v. Gallant, 108 N.H. 72, 227 A.2d 597 (1967)) breathalyzer tests are commonly adminis *723 tered by law enforcement officers certified for this purpose by the director of the division of public health.
-
State v. Gillis
321 A.2d 576
N.H. 1974
There was substantial compliance with the regulations in this case.
-
Daneault v. Clarke
309 A.2d 884
N.H. 1973
State v. Gallagher, 102 N.H. 335, 338, 156 A.2d 765, 768 (1959); State v. Gallant, 108 N.H. 72, 76, 227 A.2d 597, 599 (1967); State v. Severance, 108 N.H. 404, 237 A.2d 683 (1968); Annot., 88 A.L.R.2d 1064 (1963).
-
Harlan v. State
308 A.2d 856
N.H. 1973
She urges that *196 this period for reconsideration should extend for as long a time as the test results still will be valid, which may be as long as four hours after the arrest.
-
State v. Larochelle
297 A.2d 223
N.H. 1972
State v. Gallant, 108 N.H. 72, 227 A.2d 597 (1967); Watts, Some Observations on Police-Administered Tests for Intoxication, 45 N.C.L.
- State Ex Rel. Williams v. City Ct. of City of Tucson 487 P.2d 766 Ariz. Ct. App. 1971
-
State v. Petkus
269 A.2d 123
N.H. 1970
Furthermore our statute (RSA 262-A:69-i) and our decisions (State v. Gallant, 108 N.H. 72, 227 A.2d 597; State v. LaFountain, 108 N.H. 219, 231 A.2d 635; State v. Groulx, 109 N.H. 281, 249 A.2d 690) provide that a defendant’s blood will be taken, handled and analysed in such a manner as to insure that the test and results will not be “ riddled with innumerable dangers and variable factors which might