DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Lachapelle v. Goffstown, 225 A.2d 624.

13 citing documents.

  • Town of Goffstown v. Thibeault 529 A.2d 930 N.H. 1987
    This court has upheld zoning ordinances that terminate nonconforming uses where “there has been either a finding that alternative uses for the land exist or a provision in the applicable ordinance allowing for continued use for a terminable period.” Surry, 115 N.H. at 34, 332 A.2d at 175; see LaChapelle v. Goffstown, 107 N.H. 485, 488, 225 A.2d 624, 626 (1967) (zoning ordinance provisions ‘“requiring the termination of nonconforming uses within a specified period of time [are] upheld as a proper
  • Loundsbury v. City of Keene 453 A.2d 1278 N.H. 1982
    *1010 See L. Grossman & Sons, Inc. v. Town of Gilford, 118 N.H. at 483, 387 A.2d at 1180; Flanagan v. Hollis, 112 N.H. 222, 225, 293 A.2d 328, 329-30 (1972); Lachapelle v. Goffstown, 107 N.H. 485, 487, 225 A.2d 624, 626 (1967).
  • City of Lebanon v. Townsend 424 A.2d 201 N.H. 1980
    He does not challenge the authority of the City of Lebanon to exercise its police power to regulate the use of property within the city limits, see State v. Cohen, 73 N.H. 543, 63 A. 928 (1906), the reasonableness of requiring a license as a condition to operating a junkyard, see Lachapelle v. Goffstown, 107 N.H. 485, 225 A.2d 624 (1967), or the reasonableness of imposing fines to force compliance with the ordinance, see State v. Fletcher, 5 N.H. 257 (1830).
  • L. Grossman & Sons, Inc. v. Town of Gilford 387 A.2d 1178 N.H. 1978
    This court in Lachapelle v. Town of Goffstown, 107 N.H. 485, 225 A.2d 624 (1967) upheld the right of the town to terminate within a year a nonconforming use of land as an automobile junkyard in a residential area.
  • Wunderlich v. Town of Webster 371 A.2d 1177 N.H. 1977
    The problem of nonconforming uses is a particularly difficult one for towns attempting systematic planning through zoning.
  • Sibson v. State 336 A.2d 239 N.H. 1975
    at 225, 293 A.2d at 330; Lachapelle v. Goffstown, 107 N.H. 485, 225 A.2d 624 (1967).
  • Town of Surry v. Starkey 332 A.2d 172 N.H. 1975
    L. Rev. 1, 42 (1971); LaChapelle v. Goffstown, 107 N.H. 485, 487, 225 A.2d 624, 626 (1967); Livingston Rock & Gravel Co. v. County of Los Angeles, 43 Cal.
  • Riverview Park, Inc. v. Town of Hinsdale 313 A.2d 733 N.H. 1973
    Amherst v. Cadorette, 113 N.H. at 15, 300 A.2d at 329; Flanagan v. Hollis, 112 N.H. 222, 293 A.2d 328 (1972); Wentworth Hotel, Inc. v. New Castle, 112 N.H. 21, 287 A.2d 615 (1972); Lachapelle v. Goffstown, 107 N.H. 485, 225 A.2d 624 (1967).
  • Town of Amherst v. Cadorette 300 A.2d 327 N.H. 1973
    In furtherance of this policy we have approved reasonable provisions for the amortization of certain nonconforming uses.
  • Flanagan v. Town of Hollis 293 A.2d 328 N.H. 1972
    Because the practical result of this ordinance is to restrict continuation of a nonconforming use, we hold the principles enunciated in Lachapelle v. Goffstown, 107 N.H. 485, 225 A.2d 624 (1967), to be controlling.
  • Wentworth Hotel, Inc. v. Town of New Castle 287 A.2d 615 N.H. 1972
    Arsenault v. Keene, 104 N.H. 356, 187 A.2d 60 (1962); LaChapelle v. Goffstown, 107 N.H. 485, 225 A.2d 624 (1967).
  • New Boston v. Coombs 284 A.2d 920 N.H. 1971
    While the regulation of private dumps, junk yards, and billboards has been sanctioned by more specific statutory authority than regulation of mobile homes (RSA ch. 147; RSA 267-A:12; Lachapelle v. Goffstown, 107 N.H. 485, 489, 225 A.2d 624, 627 (1967).
  • Sibson v. State 282 A.2d 664 N.H. 1971
    Sundeen v. Rogers, 83 N.H. 253, 257, 141 A. 142, 144 (1928); Lachapelle v. Goffstown, 107 N.H. 485, 489, 225 A.2d 624, 627 (1967); MacGibbon v. Board of Appeals, 356 Mass. 635, 255 N.E.2d 347 (1970); Spaid v. Board of County *308 Comm’rs., 259 Md.