DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite General Electric Co. v. Dole Company, 202 A.2d 486.

13 citing documents.

  • General Insulation Co. v. Eckman Construction 992 A.2d 613 N.H. 2010
    State v. Yates, 152 N.H. 245, 255 (2005); see General Electric Co. v. Dole, 105 N.H. 477, 479 (1964).
  • State v. Baird 581 A.2d 1313 N.H. 1990
    “A statute will not be interpreted so as to produce an unjust and seemingly illogical result.” Appeal of Coastal Materials Corp., 130 N.H. 98, 105, 534 A.2d 398, 402 (1987) (citing General Electric Co. v. Dole Co., 105 N.H. 477, 479, 202 A.2d 486, 488 (1964)); State v. Howland, 125 N.H. 497, 502, 484 A.2d 1076, 1078 (1984).
  • Lyle Signs, Inc. v. Evroks Corporation & Travelers Indemnity Co. 562 A.2d 785 N.H. 1989
    Naylor Pipe, 120 N.H. at 697, 421 A.2d at 1013; General Electric Co. v. Dole Company, 105 N.H. 477, 480, 202 A.2d 486, 488 (1964).
  • Johnson v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. 559 A.2d 838 N.H. 1989
    General Electric Co. v. Dole Company, 105 N.H. 477, 479, 202 A.2d 486, 488 (1964) (court will not interpret statute so as to produce an unjust and seemingly illogical result).
  • Psychiatric Institute of America v. Mediplex, Inc. 536 A.2d 169 N.H. 1987
    Moreover, this court will not interpret a statute so as to produce unjust and seemingly illogical results, General Electric Co. v. Dole Company, 105 N.H. 477, 479-80, 202 A.2d 486, 488 (1964), or unjust consequences, In re Sargent, 116 N.H. 77, 354 A.2d 404 (1976).
  • Appeal of Coastal Materials Corp. 534 A.2d 398 N.H. 1987
    General Electric Co. v. Dole Co., 105 N.H. 477, 479, 202 A.2d 486, 488 (1964).
  • State v. Howland 484 A.2d 1076 N.H. 1984
    In light of this court’s historical reluctance to construe our statutes so as to produce unjust or seemingly illogical results, General Electric Co. v. Dole Company, 105 N.H. 477, 479, 202 A.2d 486, 488 (1964), we will assume a reasonable interpretation of the reporting law, RSA 169-C:29 to:40 (Supp. 1983), and exclude the perpetrators of child abuse or neglect from the immunity provision, RSA 169-C:31 (Supp. 1983).
  • State v. ROGER M. 424 A.2d 1139 N.H. 1981
    It has long been settled here that our court will not *22 interpret a statute so as to produce an injust and seemingly illogical result.” Doe v. State, 114 N.H. 714, 717, 328 A.2d 784, 786 (1974), quoting General Electric Co. v. Dole Company, 105 N.H. 477, 479, 292 A.2d 486, 488 (1964).
  • Naylor Pipe Co. v. Murray Walter, Inc. 421 A.2d 1012 N.H. 1980
    General Electric Co. v. Dole, 105 N.H. *698 477, 480, 202 A.2d 486, 488 (1964); see 72 C.J.S.
  • Town of Plainfield v. Brandstatter 345 A.2d 404 N.H. 1975
    Doe v. State, 114 N.H. 714, 328 A.2d 784 (1974); General Electric Co. v. Dole Company, 105 N.H. 477, 202 A.2d 486 (1964).
  • Doe v. State 328 A.2d 784 N.H. 1974
    General Electric Co. v. Dole Company, 105 N.H. 477, 479, 202 A.2d 486, 488 (1964).
  • Hampton National Bank v. State 314 A.2d 668 N.H. 1974
    General Electric Co. v. Dole, 105 N.H. 477, 479-80, 202 A.2d 486, 488 (1964); Boulia-Gorrell Lumber Co. v. Company, 84 N.H. 174, 148 A. 28 (1929).
  • Menge v. City of Manchester 311 A.2d 116 N.H. 1973
    Peterborough Savings Bank v. King, 103 N.H. 206, 209, 168 A.2d 116, 118 (1961); General Electric Co. v. Dole Company, 105 N.H. 477, 202 A.2d 486 (1964); Hill v. State, 107 N.H. 56, 217 A.2d 502 (1966).