DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite McKinney v. Riley, 197 A.2d 218.

15 citing documents.

  • Lower Bartlett Water Precinct v. Murnik 845 A.2d 1245 N.H. 2004
    The purpose of warrant articles is “to give information to the voters of the subject-matters to be acted on in town-meeting.” McKinney v. Riley, 105 N.H. 249, 252 (1964) (quotation omitted).
  • Treisman v. Town of Bedford 563 A.2d 786 N.H. 1989
    New Hampshire, however, recognizes the doctrine of substantial compliance.
  • State v. Hamel 547 A.2d 223 N.H. 1988
    McKinney v. Riley, 105 N.H. 249, 250, 197 A.2d 218, 220 (1964) (order of calling witnesses, at least in civil case, rests in sound discretion of trial court); 6 WlGMORE supra.
  • Town of Goffstown v. Thibeault 529 A.2d 930 N.H. 1987
    the public benefit outweighs the private injury, and the time allowed is reasonable’ ”) (quoting McKinney v. Riley, 105 N.H. 249, 253, 197 A.2d 218, 222 (1964)).
  • Town of Nottingham v. Harvey 424 A.2d 1125 N.H. 1980
    Bourgeois v. Town of Bedford, 120 N.H. 145, 148, 412 A.2d 1021, 1023 (1980); Barcomb v. Herman, 116 N.H. 318, 320, 358 A.2d 400, 402 (1976); Gutoski v. Winchester, 114 N.H. 414, 416, 322 A.2d 4, 6 (1974); McKinney v. Riley, 105 N.H. 249, 252, 197 A.2d 218, 221 (1964).
  • Bourgeois v. Town of Bedford 412 A.2d 1021 N.H. 1980
    Keene v. Gerry’s Cash Mkt., Inc., 113 N.H. 165, 304 A.2d 873 *148 (1973); McKinney v. Riley, 105 N.H. 249, 197 A.2d 218 (1964).
  • L. Grossman & Sons, Inc. v. Town of Gilford 387 A.2d 1178 N.H. 1978
    In doing so, it followed the lead of McKinney v. Riley, 105 N.H. 249, 197 A.2d 218 (1964), also a junkyard case.
  • Barcomb v. Herman 358 A.2d 400 N.H. 1976
    Bridgham v. Keene, 112 N.H. 84, 289 A.2d 392 (1972); McKinney v. Riley, 105 N.H. 249, 197 A.2d 218 (1964); 2 E. Yokley, Municipal Corporations § 317 (1957).
  • Gutoski v. Town of Winchester 322 A.2d 4 N.H. 1974
    McKinney v. Riley, 105 N.H. 249, 197 A.2d 218 (1964); Bosse v. Portsmouth, 107 N.H. 523, 226 A.2d 99 (1967).
  • Rye Beach Village District v. Beaudoin 315 A.2d 181 N.H. 1974
    Russell v. Dyer, 40 N.H. 173, 187-88 (1860); see McKinney v. Riley, 105 N.H. 249, 197 A.2d 218 (1964).
  • County of Cheshire v. City of Keene 314 A.2d 639 N.H. 1974
    Bridgham v. Keene, 112 N.H. 84, 86, 289 A.2d 392, 393-94 (1972); McKinney v. Riley, 105 N.H. 249, 252, 197 A.2d 218, 221 (1964).
  • Robie v. Lillis 299 A.2d 155 N.H. 1972
    6-A American Law of Property, supra s. 28.23, at 68; Restatement (Second) of Torts, supra s. 821B(2) (a); see Urie v. Franconia Paper Co., 107 N.H. 131, 218 A.2d 360 (1966); McKinney v. Riley, 105 N.H. 249, 197 A.2d 218 (1964); White v. Suncook Mills, 91 N.H. 92, 13 A.2d 729 (1940).
  • Flanagan v. Town of Hollis 293 A.2d 328 N.H. 1972
    McKinney v. Riley, 105 N.H. 249, 197 A.2d 218 (1964); Annot., 22 A.L.R.3d 1134 (1968); Note, 24 U. Pitt.
  • Bridgham v. City of Keene 289 A.2d 392 N.H. 1972
    Taking the allegations most favorable to the plaintiffs as true, there was nevertheless substantial compliance with the statute.
  • Loney Ex Rel. Towle v. Parsons 284 A.2d 910 N.H. 1971
    McKinney v. Riley, 105 N.H. 249, 197 A.2d 218 (1964); Rosenberg, Judicial Discretion of the Trial Court, Viewed from Above, 22 Syracuse L. Rev. 635 (1971).