Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Chagnon v. Union-Leader Corp., 190 A.2d 721.

15 citing documents.

  • Union Leader Corporation & a. v. Town of Salem N.H. 2020
    Chagnon v. Union Leader Corp., 104 N.H. 472, 474 (1963), superseded on other grounds by statute as stated in Hanchett v. Brezner Tanning Co., 107 N.H. 236 (1966) (explaining that legislative “intent, rather than any arbitrary canons of statutory construction, is controlling”).
  • Caroline Casey & a. v. New Hampshire Secretary of State & a. N.H. 2020
    Chagnon v. Union-Leader Co., 104 N.H. 472, 474 (1963), superseded on other grounds by statute as stated in Hanchett v. Brezner Tanning Co., 107 N.H. 236, 241 (1966).
  • In the Matter of the Liquidation of The Home Insurance Company 89 A.3d 165 N.H. 2014
    Indeed, the legislature amended RSA 524:1-b in 1963 in response to our holding in Chagnon v. Union-Leader Co., 104 N.H. 472 (1963), in which we held that certain kinds of libel actions did not entitle parties to prejudgment interest under the statute.
  • General Insulation Co. v. Eckman Construction 992 A.2d 613 N.H. 2010
    Chagnon v. Union-Leader Co., 104 N.H. 472, 474 (1963) (legislative intent, not arbitrary *615 canons of statutory construction, is controlling), superseded on other grounds by statute as stated in Hanchett v. Brezner Tanning Co., 107 N.H. 236 (1966).
  • Trovato v. Deveau 736 A.2d 1212 N.H. 1999
    While RSA 556:13, on its face, sheds no light on the purpose of the cap, a review of the statute’s legislative history, Chagnon v. Union-Leader Co., 104 N.H. 472, 476, 190 A.2d 721, 724 (1963) (law interpreted in light of its legislative history), and prior amendments, Del Norte, Inc. v. Provencher, 142 N.H. 535, 538, 703 A.2d 890, 892 (1997) (statute’s predecessors offer additional aid), reveals a legislative intent to limit wrongful death recovery for decedents without dep
  • Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance v. Ralph 640 A.2d 763 N.H. 1994
    Chagnon v. Union-Leader Co., 104 N.H. 472, 476, 190 A.2d 721, 724 (1963).
  • Appeal of Coastal Materials Corp. 534 A.2d 398 N.H. 1987
    Chagnon v. Union-Leader Corp., 104 N.H. 472, 477, 190 A.2d 721, 722 (1963).
  • Gallagher v. Town of Windham 427 A.2d 37 N.H. 1981
    Chagnon v. Union-Leader Co., 104 N.H. 472, 477, 190 A.2d 721, 724 (1963).
  • State v. Pratt 359 A.2d 642 N.H. 1976
    Kinchla v. Baumner, 114 N.H. 818, 330 A.2d 112 (1974); Chagnon v. Union-Leader Co., 104 N.H. 472, 190 A.2d 721 (1963).
  • State v. Amato 348 A.2d 339 N.H. 1975
    Frizzell v. Charlestown, 107 N.H. 286, 288, 220 A.2d 742, 744 (1966); Chagnon v. Union-Leader Co., 104 N.H. 472, 476, 190 A.2d 721, 724 (1963); Clough v. Clough, 80 N.H. 462, 464, 119 A. 327, 328 (1922).
  • State v. Bill 347 A.2d 445 N.H. 1975
    Chagnon v. Union Leader Co., 104 N.H. 472, 190 A.2d 721 (1963); Perkins v. Company, 90 N.H. 534, 11 A.2d 811 (1940).
  • Kinchla v. Baumner 330 A.2d 112 N.H. 1974
    Frizzell v. Charlestown, 107 N.H. 286, 220 A.2d 742 (1966); Chagnon v. Union-Leader Corp., 104 N.H. 472, 190 A.2d 721 (1963); Newell v. Moreau, 94 N.H. 439, 443, 55 A.2d 476, 480 (1947).
  • Public Service Co. v. Lovejoy Granite Co. 325 A.2d 785 N.H. 1974
    On the basis of all competent evidence available (see Chag *634 non v. Union-Leader Co., 104 N.H. 472, 473-74, 190 A.2d 721, 722 (1963)), we find that the legislative intent in enacting RSA 37l:l-a (Supp. 1973) was to exclude eminent domain in public utilities cases from the provisions of RSA ch. 498-A (Supp. 1973) and to leave the issue of damages in such cases for the public utilities commission.
  • State v. Albers 303 A.2d 197 N.H. 1973
    Frizzell v. Charlestown, 107 N.H. 286, 220 A.2d 742 (1966); Chagnon v. Union Leader Co., 104 N.H. 472, 190 A.2d 721 (1963).
  • Plymouth School District v. State Board of Education 289 A.2d 73 N.H. 1972
    Chagnon v. Union-Leader Co., 104 N.H. 472, 473, 190 A. 2d 721, 722 (1963).