Cited by
Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Chagnon v. Union-Leader Corp., 174 A.2d 825.
-
Lorraine MacDonald & a. v. Lisa Jacobs
201 A.3d 1253
N.H. 2019
the jury could find that the defamatory publication charged the plaintiff with a crime or with activities which would tend to injure him in his trade or business, commonly called libel per se.” Chagnon v. Union- Leader Co., 103 N.H. 426, 441 (1961); see Restatement (Second) of Torts § 570 (1977) (stating that “[o]ne who publishes matter defamatory to another in such 4 a manner as to make the publication a slander is subject to liability to the other although no special harm results if the public
-
Lassonde v. Stanton
956 A.2d 332
N.H. 2008
with activities which would tend to injure him in his trade or business, commonly called libel per se, he can recover as general damages all damages which would normally result from such a defamation, such as harm to his reputation.” Chagnon v. Union-Leader Co., 103 N.H. 426, 441 (1961), cert.
-
Thomas v. Telegraph Pub. Co.
929 A.2d 993
N.H. 2007
See, e.g., Duchesnaye v. Munro Enterprises, Inc., 125 N.H. 244, 253, 480 A.2d 123 (1984); Chagnon v. Union-Leader Co., 103 N.H. 426, 438, 174 A.2d 825 (1961), cert.
-
Thomas v. Telegraph Publishing Co.
929 A.2d 991
N.H. 2007
See, e.g., Duchesnaye v. Munro Enterprises, Inc., 125 N.H. 244, 253 (1984); Chagnon v. Union-Leader Co., 103 N.H. 426, 438 (1961), cert.
-
Simpkins v. Snow
661 A.2d 772
N.H. 1995
Chagnon v. Union-Leader Co., 103 N.H. 426, 437, 174 A.2d 825, 832 (1961), cert.
-
Duchesnaye v. Munro Entersprises, Inc.
480 A.2d 123
N.H. 1984
The defendant’s final contention is that the trial court erred in failing to find the publication conditionally privileged under the rule described in such cases as Chagnon v. Union-Leader Corp., 103 N.H. 426, 174 A.2d 825 (1961), cert.
-
Pickering v. Frink
461 A.2d 117
N.H. 1983
Chagnon v. Union-Leader Co., 103 N.H. 426, 438, 174 A.2d 825, 833 (1961), cert.
-
Morrissette v. Cowette
449 A.2d 1221
N.H. 1982
.” See Chagnon v. Union-Leader Co., 103 N.H. 426, 435, 174 A.2d 825, 831 (1961), cert.
-
Fecteau v. George J. Foster & Co.
418 A.2d 1265
N.H. 1980
1, art. 22; see Chagnon v. Union-Leader Co., 103 N.H. 426, 437, 174 A.2d 825, 833 (1961), cert.
-
Thomson v. Cash
402 A.2d 651
N.H. 1979
Chagnon v. Union-Leader Corp., 103 N.H. 426, 436, 174 A.2d 825, 831-32 (1961).
-
Matthews v. Jeans Pastry Shop, Inc.
311 A.2d 127
N.H. 1973
Adams v. Severance, 93 N.H. 289, 41 A.2d 233 (1945); Chagnon v. Union Leader Corp., 103 N.H. 426, 174 A.2d 825 (1961).
-
Vratsenes v. N. H. Auto, Inc.
289 A.2d 66
N.H. 1972
Hahn v. Hemenway, 96 N.H. 214, 72 A.2d 463 (1950); Chagnon v. Union Leader Co., 103 N.H. 426, 174 A.2d 825 (1961); 41 B.U.L.
-
J. Dunn & Sons, Inc. v. Paragon Homes of New England, Inc.
265 A.2d 5
N.H. 1970
” Chagnon v. Union Leader Co., 103 N. H. 426, 447, 174 A.2d 825, 839.
-
Murray v. Bullard Co.
265 A.2d 309
N.H. 1970
Chagnon v. Union Leader Co., 103 N. H. 426, 446, 174 A.2d 825, 838.
-
Lavoie v. Blake
211 A.2d 414
N.H. 1965
The consideration by die Presiding Justice of the plaintiff’s motion to set aside the verdict as inadequate “involved questions ol fact for the Judge and his decision should not be set aside unless no reasonable person would make it.” Roy v. Chalifoux, 95 N.H. 321, 324; see also Wisutskie v. Malouin, 88 N.H. 242, 246; Chagnon v. Union-Leader, 103 N.H. 426, 446.