DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Blevens v. Manchester, 170 A.2d 121.

14 citing documents.

  • Town of Windham v. Lawrence Savings Bank 776 A.2d 730 N.H. 2001
    While subdivision regulations provide municipalities with the authority to control developers “to promote the orderly and planned growth of relatively undeveloped areas within a municipality,” Blevens v. Manchester, 103 N.H. 284, 286 (1961) (citation omitted), the Condominium Act controls developers by limiting their power to declare real property interests created by condominium, a form of ownership.
  • Bussiere v. Roberge 714 A.2d 894 N.H. 1998
    Blevens v. Manchester, 103 N.H. 284, 286, 170 A.2d 121, 122 (1961) (stating that statutes “like RSA 36:19-29.
  • Board of Water Commissioners v. Mooney 660 A.2d 1121 N.H. 1995
    at 663-64, 582 A.2d at 606; see also Elevens v. Manchester, 103 N.H. 284, 286, 170 A.2d 121, 122-23 (1961) (“Since the subdivider of land creates the need for local improvements which are of special benefit to the subdivision, it is considered reasonable that he should bear the cost rather than the municipality and the general taxpayer.”).
  • Vachon v. Town of New Durham Zoning Board of Adjustment 557 A.2d 649 N.H. 1989
    The plaintiffs base their interpretation of RSA 674:41 on the title, “Regulation of Subdivision of Land,” which appears before RSA 674:35-42, and on references to this statutory section and its predecessor in two cases, Glick v. Town of Ossipee, 130 N.H. 643, 648-49, 547 A.2d 231, 235 (1988) and Blevens v. City of Manchester, *629 103 N.H. 284, 289, 170 A.2d 121, 124 (1961).
  • Town of Seabrook v. Tra-Sea Corp. 410 A.2d 240 N.H. 1979
    We agree generally that absent protection afforded by the grandfather clause, subdivision approval would have been required before the unapproved lots could be sold.
  • Town of Tuftonboro v. Lakeside Colony, Inc. 403 A.2d 410 N.H. 1979
    Blevens v. City of Manchester, 103 N.H. 284, 170 A.2d 121 (1961).
  • Patenaude v. Town of Meredith 392 A.2d 582 N.H. 1978
    Planless growth and haphazard development accentuate municipal problems in the demand for streets, water and sanitary services which have a direct relation to traffic, safety and health.
  • Dawe v. City of Scottsdale 581 P.2d 1136 Ariz. 1978
  • Land/Vest Properties, Inc. v. Town of Plainfield 379 A.2d 200 N.H. 1977
    Blevens v. City of Manchester, 103 N.H. 284, 170 A.2d 121 (1961); Ayres v. City Council of Los Angeles, 34 Cal.
  • Hancock v. City of Concord 322 A.2d 605 N.H. 1974
    In Blevens v. Manchester, 103 N.H. 284, 170 A.2d 121 (1961), we upheld the constitutionality of the subdivision controls enabling legislation (RSA 36:19-29) as a valid exercise of a State’s police powers.
  • Fillmore v. Town of Sanbornton 319 A.2d 103 N.H. 1974
    Vachon & Son, Inc. v. Concord, 112 N.H. 107, 289 A.2d 646 (1972); Blevens v. Manchester, 103 N.H. 284, 170 A.2d 121 (1961).
  • Leda Lanes Realty, Inc. v. City of Nashua 293 A.2d 320 N.H. 1972
  • R. A. Vachon & Son, Inc. v. City of Concord 289 A.2d 646 N.H. 1972
    3 Anderson, American Law of Zoning s. 19.23 (1968); York Township Zoning Board of Adjustment v. Brown, 407 Pa.
  • Piper v. Meredith 266 A.2d 103 N.H. 1970
    Opinion of the Justices, 103 N.H. 268, 270, 169 A.2d 762, 764; Blevens v. Manchester, 103 N.H. 284, 289, 170 A.2d 121, 124; 6 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations s. 24.03 (1969 rev. vol.).