Cited by
Opinions in New Hampshire that cite N. E. Redlon Co. v. Franklin Square Corp., 23 A.2d 370.
-
Town of Henniker v. Andre Cote, Jr.
N.H. 2023
53 N.H. 764, 786 (2006) (holding that party may preserve issue that could have been raised at earlier time by raising it in a motion for reconsideration if raising issue on reconsideration does not deprive trial court of opportunity to correct its error, or if trial court unsustainably exercises its discretion by declining to address issue solely on timeliness grounds); Redlon Co. v. Corporation, 91 N.H. 502, 505-06 (1941) (holding that trial court has discretion to reconsider interlocutory ruli
-
American Express National Bank v. Linda A. Petralia
N.H. 2022
Goudreault v. Kleeman, 158 N.H. 236, 249 (2009); Redlon Co. v. Corporation, 91 N.H. 502, 503, 505-06 (1941).
-
Karen Tuthill v. Mark Keenan
N.H. 2018
Goudreault v. Kleeman, 158 N.H. 236, 249 (2009) (citing Redlon Co. v. Corporation, 91 N.H. 502, 506 (1941)).
-
Goudreault v. Kleeman
965 A.2d 1040
N.H. 2009
“[T]he power to [reconsider an issue once decided] remains in the court until final judgment or decree.” Redlon Co. v. Corporation, 91 N.H. 502, 506 (1941) (quotation omitted).
-
Fastrack Crushing Services, Inc. v. Abatement International/Advatex Associates, Inc.
827 A.2d 1019
N.H. 2003
Redlon Co. v. Corporation, 91 N.H. 502, 505 (1941) (superior court has discretion to review its orders at any time prior to final judgment).
-
Tsiatsios v. Tsiatsios
663 A.2d 1335
N.H. 1995
Because Janice Tsiatsios first raised the issue after the jury trial had concluded, “[t]he trial court had the discretion to either not consider the issue or re-open the record and allow the parties to present evidence.” Palazzi Corp. v. Stickney, Comm’r, 136 N.H. 250, 254, 619 A.2d 1001, 1003-04 (1992); see Redlon Co. v. Corporation, 91 N.H. 502, 506, 23 A.2d 370, 374 (1941) (absent changed circumstances, reconsideration is optional, not mandatory); compare Cagan’s Inc. v. N.H. Dept. of Rev. Ad
-
State v. Poirier
617 A.2d 653
N.H. 1992
They may be exercised, and prior exercise may be corrected, as sound discretion may require, at any time prior to final judgment.” Redlon Co. v. Corporation, 91 N.H. 502, 505, 23 A.2d 370, 373 (1941) (citations omitted).
-
State v. Wilkinson
612 A.2d 926
N.H. 1992
New Hampshire law has long granted the superior court jurisdiction over a matter until its final judgment.
-
Town of Nottingham v. Bonser
552 A.2d 58
N.H. 1988
The superior court’s consideration of rehearing motions is not mandated, but is discretionary with the court, Redlon Co. v. Corporation, 91 N.H. 502, 505, 23 A.2d 370, 373 (1941).
-
Cagan's, Inc. v. New Hampshire Administration of Revenue Administration
512 A.2d 411
N.H. 1986
We will uphold a trial court’s decision on a motion for reconsideration absent an abuse of discretion.
-
Massaro v. Carter
451 A.2d 380
N.H. 1982
Redlon Co. v. Corporation, 91 N.H. 502, 503, 23 A.2d 370, 372 (1941); cf. State v. Thomson, 110 N.H. 190, 191, 263 A.2d 675, 676 (1970).
-
County of Hillsborough v. Beaulieu
302 A.2d 110
N.H. 1973
Any officer of a county may be removed from office by the superior court for official misconduct.” See Redlon Co. v. Corporation, 91 N.H. 502, 506, 23 A.2d 370, 374 (1941).
-
State v. Thomson
263 A.2d 675
N.H. 1970
Redlon Co. v. Corporation, 91 N. H. 502, 23 A.2d 370; United States v. Benz, supra; State v. Bess, 53 N. J. 10, 247 A.2d 669.