Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite N. E. Redlon Co. v. Franklin Square Corp., 23 A.2d 370.

13 citing documents.

  • Town of Henniker v. Andre Cote, Jr. N.H. 2023
    53 N.H. 764, 786 (2006) (holding that party may preserve issue that could have been raised at earlier time by raising it in a motion for reconsideration if raising issue on reconsideration does not deprive trial court of opportunity to correct its error, or if trial court unsustainably exercises its discretion by declining to address issue solely on timeliness grounds); Redlon Co. v. Corporation, 91 N.H. 502, 505-06 (1941) (holding that trial court has discretion to reconsider interlocutory ruli
  • American Express National Bank v. Linda A. Petralia N.H. 2022
    Goudreault v. Kleeman, 158 N.H. 236, 249 (2009); Redlon Co. v. Corporation, 91 N.H. 502, 503, 505-06 (1941).
  • Karen Tuthill v. Mark Keenan N.H. 2018
    Goudreault v. Kleeman, 158 N.H. 236, 249 (2009) (citing Redlon Co. v. Corporation, 91 N.H. 502, 506 (1941)).
  • Goudreault v. Kleeman 965 A.2d 1040 N.H. 2009
    “[T]he power to [reconsider an issue once decided] remains in the court until final judgment or decree.” Redlon Co. v. Corporation, 91 N.H. 502, 506 (1941) (quotation omitted).
  • Fastrack Crushing Services, Inc. v. Abatement International/Advatex Associates, Inc. 827 A.2d 1019 N.H. 2003
    Redlon Co. v. Corporation, 91 N.H. 502, 505 (1941) (superior court has discretion to review its orders at any time prior to final judgment).
  • Tsiatsios v. Tsiatsios 663 A.2d 1335 N.H. 1995
    Because Janice Tsiatsios first raised the issue after the jury trial had concluded, “[t]he trial court had the discretion to either not consider the issue or re-open the record and allow the parties to present evidence.” Palazzi Corp. v. Stickney, Comm’r, 136 N.H. 250, 254, 619 A.2d 1001, 1003-04 (1992); see Redlon Co. v. Corporation, 91 N.H. 502, 506, 23 A.2d 370, 374 (1941) (absent changed circumstances, reconsideration is optional, not mandatory); compare Cagan’s Inc. v. N.H. Dept. of Rev. Ad
  • State v. Poirier 617 A.2d 653 N.H. 1992
    They may be exercised, and prior exercise may be corrected, as sound discretion may require, at any time prior to final judgment.” Redlon Co. v. Corporation, 91 N.H. 502, 505, 23 A.2d 370, 373 (1941) (citations omitted).
  • State v. Wilkinson 612 A.2d 926 N.H. 1992
    New Hampshire law has long granted the superior court jurisdiction over a matter until its final judgment.
  • Town of Nottingham v. Bonser 552 A.2d 58 N.H. 1988
    The superior court’s consideration of rehearing motions is not mandated, but is discretionary with the court, Redlon Co. v. Corporation, 91 N.H. 502, 505, 23 A.2d 370, 373 (1941).
  • Cagan's, Inc. v. New Hampshire Administration of Revenue Administration 512 A.2d 411 N.H. 1986
    We will uphold a trial court’s decision on a motion for reconsideration absent an abuse of discretion.
  • Massaro v. Carter 451 A.2d 380 N.H. 1982
    Redlon Co. v. Corporation, 91 N.H. 502, 503, 23 A.2d 370, 372 (1941); cf. State v. Thomson, 110 N.H. 190, 191, 263 A.2d 675, 676 (1970).
  • County of Hillsborough v. Beaulieu 302 A.2d 110 N.H. 1973
    Any officer of a county may be removed from office by the superior court for official misconduct.” See Redlon Co. v. Corporation, 91 N.H. 502, 506, 23 A.2d 370, 374 (1941).
  • State v. Thomson 263 A.2d 675 N.H. 1970
    Redlon Co. v. Corporation, 91 N. H. 502, 23 A.2d 370; United States v. Benz, supra; State v. Bess, 53 N. J. 10, 247 A.2d 669.