State of New Hampshire v. Edward Farley
Opinion text
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SUPREME COURT
In Case No. 2023-0603, State of New Hampshire v. Edward
Farley, the court on October 23, 2024, issued the following
order:
The court has reviewed the written arguments and the record submitted
on appeal, and has determined to resolve the case by way of this order. See
Sup. Ct. R. 20(2). The defendant, Edward Farley, appeals the order of the
Circuit Court (Pendleton, J.), following a hearing, finding him guilty of violating
the Town of Rye’s dog ordinance. He raises numerous issues on appeal.
Based upon our review of the briefs, the relevant law, the record on
appeal, and the trial court’s decision, we find the defendant’s arguments to be
unpersuasive and affirm the trial court’s decision.
Affirmed.
MacDonald, C.J., and Bassett, Donovan, and Countway, JJ., concurred.
Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk
Semantically similar Other opinions on related ground
Ranked by cosine-distance similarity of voyage-law-2 embeddings — these read closest to this opinion's legal subject matter, not just by keyword overlap.
| Docket | Court | Filed | Disposition | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-0507 | N.H. | 2024-06-17 | — | Ellen Merrill-Pugsley & a. v. Rebecca Dalida |
| 2021-0490 | N.H. | 2022-10-05 | — | State of New Hampshire v. Allen E. Martin |
| 2022-0095 | N.H. | 2023-02-01 | — | State of New Hampshire v. Chris Bonollo |
| 2022-0072 | N.H. | 2022-12-27 | — | Heather Caswell v. Victor Ganobi |
| 2023-0745 | N.H. | 2024-08-20 | — | David Charles Peterson v. Jeanette Charon & a. |