In the Matter of Genevieve Snell and Gary Snell
In the Matter of Genevieve Snell and Gary Snell, No. 2022-0417 (N.H. Dec. 12, 2023).
The holding in the court’s own words
Based upon our review of the trial court’s well-reasoned orders, the respondent’s challenges to them, the relevant law, and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that the respondent has not demonstrated reversible error.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we work.
Opinion text
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SUPREME COURT
In Case No. 2022-0417, In the Matter of Genevieve Snell
and Gary Snell, the court on December 12, 2023, issued the
following order:
The court has reviewed the written arguments and the record submitted
on appeal, and has determined to resolve the case by way of this order. See
Sup. Ct. R. 20(2). The respondent, Gary Snell, appeals orders of the Circuit
Court (Burns, J.), in his divorce from the petitioner, Genevieve Snell. The
respondent argues that the trial court erred in: (1) finding that he engaged in
fraud, warranting consideration of additional evidence and retroactive
modification of child support; (2) denying his motion to modify child support
based upon his alleged unemployment and medical issues; and (3) awarding
attorney’s fees to the petitioner.
As the appealing party, the respondent has the burden of demonstrating
reversible error. Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014). Based upon our
review of the trial court’s well-reasoned orders, the respondent’s challenges to
them, the relevant law, and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that
the respondent has not demonstrated reversible error. See id.
Affirmed.
Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ., concurred.
Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk