2022-0417 Nonprecedential Processed

In the Matter of Genevieve Snell and Gary Snell

Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Filed December 12, 2023

Opinion text

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

SUPREME COURT

In Case No. 2022-0417, In the Matter of Genevieve Snell
and Gary Snell, the court on December 12, 2023, issued the
following order:

The court has reviewed the written arguments and the record submitted
on appeal, and has determined to resolve the case by way of this order. See
Sup. Ct. R. 20(2). The respondent, Gary Snell, appeals orders of the Circuit
Court (Burns, J.), in his divorce from the petitioner, Genevieve Snell. The
respondent argues that the trial court erred in: (1) finding that he engaged in
fraud, warranting consideration of additional evidence and retroactive
modification of child support; (2) denying his motion to modify child support
based upon his alleged unemployment and medical issues; and (3) awarding
attorney’s fees to the petitioner.

As the appealing party, the respondent has the burden of demonstrating
reversible error. Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014). Based upon our
review of the trial court’s well-reasoned orders, the respondent’s challenges to
them, the relevant law, and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that
the respondent has not demonstrated reversible error. See id.

Affirmed.

Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ., concurred.

Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk

Semantically similar Other opinions on related ground

Ranked by cosine-distance similarity of voyage-law-2 embeddings — these read closest to this opinion's legal subject matter, not just by keyword overlap.

Docket Court Filed Disposition Case
2023-0199 N.H. 2024-05-01 In the Matter of Amanda Picardi and William Picardi
2021-0113 N.H. 2023-01-04 In the Matter of Kelly Goodwin and Adam Goodwin
2023-0168 N.H. 2024-01-11 In the Matter of Keri-Ann Hopps-Geoffroy and Jordan Geoffroy
2022-0440 N.H. 2023-04-07 In the Matter of Lauren Dinardo and Nicholas Dinardo
2024-0587 N.H. 2025-09-29 In the Matter of Elizabeth Reid and Bradley Reid; In re Guardianship of C.R.