Deanne Sanville v. William Trybulski & a.
Deanne Sanville v. William Trybulski & a., No. 2022-0325 (N.H. Feb. 1, 2023).
The holding in the court’s own words
Based upon our review of the parties’ written arguments, the relevant law, the record on appeal, and the trial court’s thorough and well-reasoned decision, we conclude that the plaintiff has not demonstrated reversible error.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we work.
Opinion text
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SUPREME COURT
In Case No. 2022-0325, Deanne Sanville v. William
Trybulski & a., the court on February 1, 2023, issued the
following order:
The court has reviewed the written arguments and the record submitted
on appeal, and has determined to resolve the case by way of this order. See
Sup. Ct. R. 20(2). The plaintiff, Deanne Sanville, appeals an order of the
Superior Court (Honigberg, J.) granting summary judgment in favor of the
defendants on the plaintiff’s claim for rescission of a 2009 private road
maintenance agreement. Based upon our review of the parties’ written
arguments, the relevant law, the record on appeal, and the trial court’s
thorough and well-reasoned decision, we conclude that the plaintiff has not
demonstrated reversible error. See Sup. Ct. R. 25(8); Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H.
737, 740 (2014). We, therefore, affirm the trial court’s decision.
Affirmed.
MacDonald, C.J., and Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ.,
concurred.
Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk