Katherine Spaulding v. Harold Ekstrom
Opinion text
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SUPREME COURT
In Case No. 2021-0557, Katherine Spaulding v. Harold
Ekstrom, the court on October 17, 2022, issued the following
order:
Having considered the briefs filed by the plaintiff, Katherine Spaulding, the
memorandum of law filed by the defendant, Harold Ekstrom, and the record
submitted on appeal, the court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary in
this case, see Sup. Ct. R. 18(1), and that the plaintiff, as the appealing party, has
not established reversible error, see Sup. Ct. R. 25(8); Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H.
737, 740 (2014).
Affirmed.
MacDonald, C.J., and Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ.,
concurred.
Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk
Semantically similar Other opinions on related ground
Ranked by cosine-distance similarity of voyage-law-2 embeddings — these read closest to this opinion's legal subject matter, not just by keyword overlap.
| Docket | Court | Filed | Disposition | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-0578 | N.H. | 2022-09-29 | — | Michael Stringer & a. v. Jason Muir & a. |
| 2021-0449 | N.H. | 2022-10-18 | — | Lola Pelletier v. Karen Simpson |
| 2021-0536 | N.H. | 2022-09-16 | — | Paul Ranberg v. HFloesser Realty NH, LLC |
| 2021-0293 | N.H. | 2022-09-06 | — | Soheil Moayedi Azarpour & a. v. Ridges Peak Remodeling |
| 2022-0161 | N.H. | 2022-09-29 | — | Michael Stringer & a. v. MJ 20 Beacon St., LLC & a. |