State of New Hampshire v. Allen E. Martin
Opinion text
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SUPREME COURT
In Case No. 2021-0490, State of New Hampshire v. Allen E.
Martin, the court on October 5, 2022, issued the following order:
Having considered the brief filed by the defendant, Allen E. Martin, the
memorandum of law filed by the State, and the record submitted on appeal, the
court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary in this case, see Sup. Ct. R.
18(1), and that the defendant, as the appealing party, has not established
reversible error, see Sup. Ct. R. 25(8); Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740
(2014).
Affirmed.
MacDonald, C.J., and Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ.,
concurred.
Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk
Semantically similar Other opinions on related ground
Ranked by cosine-distance similarity of voyage-law-2 embeddings — these read closest to this opinion's legal subject matter, not just by keyword overlap.
| Docket | Court | Filed | Disposition | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-0293 | N.H. | 2022-09-06 | — | Soheil Moayedi Azarpour & a. v. Ridges Peak Remodeling |
| 2021-0449 | N.H. | 2022-10-18 | — | Lola Pelletier v. Karen Simpson |
| 2020-0127 | N.H. | 2021-03-18 | — | State of New Hampshire v. Loretta A. Obi |
| 2021-0334 | N.H. | 2022-09-30 | — | Rainmaker Irrigation v. Moira Ryan |
| 2020-0191 | N.H. | 2021-02-25 | — | In the Matter of Paul Hunt and Rachael Hunt |