Lance A. Costello & a. v. Theresa L. Glover & a.
Opinion text
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SUPREME COURT
In Case No. 2021-0488, Lance A. Costello & a. v. Theresa L.
Glover & a., the court on August 11, 2022, issued the following
order:
Having considered the brief of plaintiff Lance A. Costello and the record
submitted on appeal, we conclude that oral argument is unnecessary in this
case. See Sup. Ct. R. 18(1). Plaintiff Lance A. Costello appeals an order of the
Superior Court (Bornstein, J.) granting a motion for periodic payment of a
judgment in the total amount of $52,690, and requiring the defendants, Roland
S. Glover and Theresa L. Glover, to make payments on the judgment of $200
per month. See RSA 524:6-a (2021). We construe the brief to argue that the
trial court erred by determining, following an evidentiary hearing, that the
defendants have the ability to pay only $200 per month on the judgment. See
RSA 524:6-a, I. We affirm.
It is the burden of the appealing party, here Lance A. Costello, to provide
a record that is sufficient to decide the issues raised on appeal. Bean v. Red
Oak Prop. Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004). In the absence of a transcript of a
relevant evidentiary hearing, we assume that the evidence was sufficient to
support the result reached by the trial court, see id., and we review the trial
court’s decision for errors of law appearing on the face of its order only, see
Atwood v. Owens, 142 N.H. 396, 397 (1997). In this case, Lance A. Costello
has not provided a transcript of the hearing on the motion for periodic
payments. Nor has Lance A. Costello provided a copy of the defendants’
affidavit of assets and liabilities referenced in the trial court’s order.
Accordingly, we conclude that the evidence was sufficient to support the trial
court’s determination that the defendants have the ability to pay only $200 per
month, and finding no error of law on the face of the trial court’s order, we
uphold its decision.
Affirmed.
MacDonald, C.J., and Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ.,
concurred.
Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk
Semantically similar Other opinions on related ground
Ranked by cosine-distance similarity of voyage-law-2 embeddings — these read closest to this opinion's legal subject matter, not just by keyword overlap.
| Docket | Court | Filed | Disposition | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-0696 | N.H. | 2024-10-29 | — | Katherine Whybrow, as power of attorney and on behalf of M. Ruth Whybrow v. Tho… |
| 2022-0123 | N.H. | 2022-11-30 | — | Truist Bank & a. v. Samson Duclair & a. |
| 2021-0505 | N.H. | 2023-02-10 | — | American Express National Bank v. Susan W. Jackson |
| 2018-0596 | N.H. | 2019-09-12 | — | Scott Eaton v. Carin Hallum White & a. |
| 2021-0311 | N.H. | 2022-09-16 | — | Arnold Communications, LLC v. Shahryar Pezeshki & a. |