In the Matter of Matthew Pelissier and Jennifer Reeves
In the Matter of Matthew Pelissier and Jennifer Reeves, No. 2021-0384 (N.H. Oct. 27, 2022).
The holding in the court’s own words
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT In Case No. 2021-0384, In the Matter of Matthew Pelissier and Jennifer Reeves, the court on October 27, 2022, issued the following order: Having considered the briefs and record submitted on appeal, we conclude that oral argument is unnecessary in this case. Based upon our review of the trial court’s well-reasoned order, the petitioner’s challenges to it, the relevant law, and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that the petitioner has not demonstrated reversible error.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we work.
Opinion text
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SUPREME COURT
In Case No. 2021-0384, In the Matter of Matthew Pelissier
and Jennifer Reeves, the court on October 27, 2022, issued the
following order:
Having considered the briefs and record submitted on appeal, we conclude
that oral argument is unnecessary in this case. See Sup. Ct. R. 18(1). The
petitioner, Matthew Pelissier, appeals a final child support order issued by the
Circuit Court (Colligan, R., approved by Quigley, J.), following multiple hearings.
On appeal, the petitioner argues that the trial court erred in its calculation of his
self-employment income for purposes of child support, and by not granting him
additional time to develop and introduce evidence of his self-employment income.
As the appealing party, the petitioner has the burden of demonstrating reversible
error. Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014). Based upon our review of the
trial court’s well-reasoned order, the petitioner’s challenges to it, the relevant law,
and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that the petitioner has not
demonstrated reversible error. See id.
Affirmed.
MacDonald, C.J., and Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ.,
concurred.
Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk