Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee for Option One Mortgage Loan Trust v. Nature School Foundation, Inc. & a.
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee for Option One Mortgage Loan Trust v. Nature School Foundation, Inc. & a., No. 2021-0208, 2005-5 (N.H. Mar. 23, 2022).
The holding in the court’s own words
as Trustee for Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-5 v. Nature School Foundation, Inc. & a., the court on March 23, 2022, issued the following order: Having considered the briefs and record submitted on appeal, we conclude that oral argument is unnecessary in this case. Based upon our review of the trial court’s well-reasoned order, the defendant’s challenges to it, the relevant law, and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that the defendant has not demonstrated reversible error.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Ralph P. Gallo & a. v. Susan Traina & a. 166 N.H. 737
Opinion text
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SUPREME COURT
In Case No. 2021-0208, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee
for Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-5 v. Nature School
Foundation, Inc. & a., the court on March 23, 2022, issued the
following order:
Having considered the briefs and record submitted on appeal, we
conclude that oral argument is unnecessary in this case. See Sup. Ct. R. 18(1).
The defendant, Nature School Foundation, Inc., appeals the order of the
Superior Court (Colburn, J.) entering summary judgment for the plaintiff, Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee for Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-5
(bank). The defendant argues that the trial court erred in: (1) failing to
consider additional facts relating to the summary judgment motion; and
(2) finding no genuine issue of material fact precluding summary judgment in
the bank’s favor.
As the appealing party, the defendant has the burden of demonstrating
reversible error. Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014). Based upon our
review of the trial court’s well-reasoned order, the defendant’s challenges to it,
the relevant law, and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that the
defendant has not demonstrated reversible error. See id.
Affirmed.
MacDonald, C.J., and Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ.,
concurred.
Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk