Femi Isijola v. Director, New Hampshire Division of Motor Vehicles
Opinion text
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SUPREME COURT
In Case No. 2021-0045, Femi Isijola v. Director, New
Hampshire Division of Motor Vehicles, the court on November
18, 2021, issued the following order:
Having considered the brief and reply brief of the plaintiff, Femi Isijola,
the memorandum of law of the defendant, the Director of the New Hampshire
Division of Motor Vehicles, and the record submitted on appeal, including the
trial court’s well-reasoned order, the court concludes that oral argument is
unnecessary in this case, see Sup. Ct. R. 18(1), and that the plaintiff has not
established reversible error, see Sup. Ct. R. 25(8); see also Gallo v. Traina, 166
N.H. 737, 740 (2014).
Affirmed.
Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ., concurred.
Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk
Semantically similar Other opinions on related ground
Ranked by cosine-distance similarity of voyage-law-2 embeddings — these read closest to this opinion's legal subject matter, not just by keyword overlap.
| Docket | Court | Filed | Disposition | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-0127 | N.H. | 2021-03-18 | — | State of New Hampshire v. Loretta A. Obi |
| 2021-0449 | N.H. | 2022-10-18 | — | Lola Pelletier v. Karen Simpson |
| 2021-0557 | N.H. | 2022-10-17 | — | Katherine Spaulding v. Harold Ekstrom |
| 2019-0445 | N.H. | 2020-03-09 | — | Sanjeev Lath v. Jared Dufresne |
| 2021-0490 | N.H. | 2022-10-05 | — | State of New Hampshire v. Allen E. Martin |