In the Matter of Richard McMenamon and Eileen Rispoli
Opinion text
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SUPREME COURT
In Case No. 2021-0030, In the Matter of Richard
McMenamon and Eileen Rispoli, the court on October 5, 2022,
issued the following order:
Having considered the briefs filed by the parties and the record
submitted on appeal, the court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary in
this case, see Sup. Ct. R. 18(1), and that the petitioner, Richard McMenamon,
as the appealing party, has not established reversible error, see Sup. Ct. R.
25(8); Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014). In light of this order, the
respondent’s requests in her brief that we strike the petitioner’s brief and
dismiss the appeal are moot.
Affirmed.
Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ., concurred.
Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk
Semantically similar Other opinions on related ground
Ranked by cosine-distance similarity of voyage-law-2 embeddings — these read closest to this opinion's legal subject matter, not just by keyword overlap.
| Docket | Court | Filed | Disposition | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-0233 | N.H. | 2022-10-28 | — | In the Matter of Ashleigh Lombardo and Gregory Lombardo |
| 2020-0191 | N.H. | 2021-02-25 | — | In the Matter of Paul Hunt and Rachael Hunt |
| 2021-0490 | N.H. | 2022-10-05 | — | State of New Hampshire v. Allen E. Martin |
| 2021-0578 | N.H. | 2022-09-29 | — | Michael Stringer & a. v. Jason Muir & a. |
| 2021-0557 | N.H. | 2022-10-17 | — | Katherine Spaulding v. Harold Ekstrom |