Mary Feeney v. Karyn Kelley
Opinion text
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SUPREME COURT
In Case No. 2020-0490, Mary Feeney v. Karyn Kelley, the
court on October 20, 2021, issued the following order:
The defendant’s motion for leave to replace certain black and white
photographs in her appendix with color photographs is granted.
Having considered the briefs, memorandum of law, and record submitted
on appeal, the court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary in this case,
see Sup. Ct. R. 18(1), and that the defendant has not established reversible error,
see Sup. Ct. R. 25(8); Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014).
Affirmed.
MacDonald, C.J., and Hicks, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ.,
concurred.
Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk
Semantically similar Other opinions on related ground
Ranked by cosine-distance similarity of voyage-law-2 embeddings — these read closest to this opinion's legal subject matter, not just by keyword overlap.
| Docket | Court | Filed | Disposition | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-0449 | N.H. | 2022-10-18 | — | Lola Pelletier v. Karen Simpson |
| 2018-0253 | N.H. | 2019-01-31 | Affirmed | Mary E. Feeney v. Karyn M. Kelley |
| 2021-0557 | N.H. | 2022-10-17 | — | Katherine Spaulding v. Harold Ekstrom |
| 2021-0490 | N.H. | 2022-10-05 | — | State of New Hampshire v. Allen E. Martin |
| 2021-0334 | N.H. | 2022-09-30 | — | Rainmaker Irrigation v. Moira Ryan |