Khaled Abdel-Fattah v. Mark T. Eno
Khaled Abdel-Fattah v. Mark T. Eno, No. 2020-0330 (N.H. Mar. 2, 2021).
The holding in the court’s own words
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT In Case No. 2020-0330, Khaled Abdel-Fattah v. Mark T. Eno, the court on March 2, 2021, issued the following order: Having considered the parties’ briefs and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that oral argument is unnecessary in this case. Based upon our review of the trial court’s order, the plaintiff’s challenges to it, the relevant law, and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that he has not demonstrated reversible error.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we work.
Opinion text
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SUPREME COURT
In Case No. 2020-0330, Khaled Abdel-Fattah v. Mark T.
Eno, the court on March 2, 2021, issued the following order:
Having considered the parties’ briefs and the record submitted on appeal,
we conclude that oral argument is unnecessary in this case. See Sup. Ct. R.
18(1). The plaintiff, Khaled Abdel-Fattah, appeals an order of the Superior
Court (Colburn, J.) dismissing his complaint against the defendant, Mark
T. Eno, for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted when he
declined to amend his complaint to correct its deficiencies after having been
given 20 days to do so. We affirm.
As the appealing party, the plaintiff has the burden of demonstrating
reversible error. Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014). Based upon our
review of the trial court’s order, the plaintiff’s challenges to it, the relevant law,
and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that he has not
demonstrated reversible error. See id.
Affirmed.
Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ., concurred.
Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk