Joseph S. Haas, Jr. v. Town of Gilmanton
Opinion text
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SUPREME COURT
In Case No. 2020-0325, Joseph S. Haas, Jr. v. Town of
Gilmanton, the court on May 13, 2021, issued the following
order:
Having considered the opening and reply briefs of the plaintiff, Joseph S.
Haas, Jr., the memorandum of law of the defendant, the Town of Gilmanton,
and the record submitted on appeal, the court concludes that oral argument is
unnecessary in this case, see Sup. Ct. R. 18(1), and that the appealing party,
the plaintiff, has not established reversible error, see Sup. Ct. R. 25(8); see also
Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014).
Affirmed.
Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ., concurred.
Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk
Semantically similar Other opinions on related ground
Ranked by cosine-distance similarity of voyage-law-2 embeddings — these read closest to this opinion's legal subject matter, not just by keyword overlap.
| Docket | Court | Filed | Disposition | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-0100 | N.H. | 2022-10-18 | — | Donato J. Dandreo, III & a. v. Town of Salem & a. |
| 2021-0536 | N.H. | 2022-09-16 | — | Paul Ranberg v. HFloesser Realty NH, LLC |
| 2022-0326 | N.H. | 2023-01-30 | — | Joe S. Haas, Jr. v. Merrimack Valley School District - SAU 46 & a. |
| 2018-0289 | N.H. | 2019-01-31 | — | Joseph S. Haas v. Town of Boscawen |
| 2019-0295 | N.H. | 2019-10-25 | — | Joseph Sanders Haas, Jr. v. City of Nashua & a. |