Baboucar Taal v. St. Mary's Bank; Baboucar Taal v. Niederman, Stanzel and Lindsey & a.

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

SUPREME COURT

In Case No. 2020-0297, Baboucar Taal v. St. Mary's Bank;
Baboucar Taal v. Niederman, Stanzel and Lindsey & a., the court
on April 1, 2021, issued the following order:

On June 22, 2020, the plaintiff, Baboucar Taal, filed a notice of appeal
listing two superior court cases: Baboucar Taal v. St. Mary’s Bank, No. 216-
2011-CV-00741, and Baboucar Taal v. Niederman Stanzel & Lindsey, PLLC & a.,
No. 216-2011-CV-00742. On June 29, 2020, and again on September 2, 2020,
the plaintiff was ordered to “file a copy of the decision below, the clerk’s written
notice of the decision below, any order disposing of a timely-filed post-trial
motion, and the clerk’s written notice of any order disposing of a timely-filed
post-trial motion.” See Rule 7(6). The plaintiff only partially complied with this
order, however. Because the plaintiff has failed to file with this court a copy of
the trial court decision in Baboucar Taal v. Niederman Stanzel & Lindsey, PLLC
& a., No. 216-2011-CV-00742 that he intends to appeal, his appeal as it relates
to that case is hereby dismissed.

As to Baboucar Taal v. St. Mary’s Bank, No. 216-2011-CV-00741, having
considered the briefs and record submitted on appeal, the court concludes that
oral argument is unnecessary in this case, see Sup. Ct. R. 18(1), and that the
appealing party, the plaintiff, has not established reversible error, see Sup. Ct. R.
25(8); see also Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014).

Affirmed in part and
dismissed in part.

Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ., concurred.

Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk