Khaled Abdel-Fattah v. Fatima Belal; Fatima Belal v. Khaled Abdel-Fattah
Opinion text
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SUPREME COURT
In Case No. 2019-0207, Khaled Abdel-Fattah v. Fatima
Belal; Fatima Belal v. Khaled Abdel-Fattah, the court on October
25, 2019, issued the following order:
Having considered the parties’ briefs and the record submitted on appeal,
we conclude that oral argument is unnecessary in this case. See Sup. Ct. R.
18(1). Khaled Abdel-Fattah appeals a decision of the Superior Court (Temple, J.)
denying his motion for summary judgment on the ground that his motion
concerned cases in which a judgment on the merits, in favor of Fatima Belal, had
become final in May 2018. We affirm.
As the appealing party, Abdel-Fattah has the burden of demonstrating
reversible error. Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014). Based upon our
review of the trial court’s order, Abdel-Fattah’s challenges to it, the relevant law,
and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that he has not demonstrated
reversible error. See id.
Affirmed.
Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ., concurred.
Eileen Fox,
Clerk
Semantically similar Other opinions on related ground
Ranked by cosine-distance similarity of voyage-law-2 embeddings — these read closest to this opinion's legal subject matter, not just by keyword overlap.
| Docket | Court | Filed | Disposition | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-0037 | N.H. | 2021-12-17 | — | Khaled Abdel-Fattah v. Fatima Belal; Fatima Belal v. Khaled Abdel-Fattah |
| 2020-0330 | N.H. | 2021-03-02 | — | Khaled Abdel-Fattah v. Mark T. Eno |
| 2021-0315 | N.H. | 2022-01-14 | — | American Express National Bank v. Linda A. Petralia |
| 2020-0297 | N.H. | 2021-04-01 | — | Baboucar Taal v. St. Mary's Bank; Baboucar Taal v. Niederman, Stanzel and Linds… |
| 2021-0557 | N.H. | 2022-10-17 | — | Katherine Spaulding v. Harold Ekstrom |