Khaled Abdel-Fattah v. Fatima Belal; Fatima Belal v. Khaled Abdel-Fattah
Khaled Abdel-Fattah v. Fatima Belal; Fatima Belal v. Khaled Abdel-Fattah, No. 2019-0207 (N.H. Oct. 25, 2019).
The holding in the court’s own words
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT In Case No. 2019-0207, Khaled Abdel-Fattah v. Fatima Belal; Fatima Belal v. Khaled Abdel-Fattah, the court on October 25, 2019, issued the following order: Having considered the parties’ briefs and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that oral argument is unnecessary in this case. Based upon our review of the trial court’s order, Abdel-Fattah’s challenges to it, the relevant law, and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that he has not demonstrated reversible error.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Opinion text
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SUPREME COURT
In Case No. 2019-0207, Khaled Abdel-Fattah v. Fatima
Belal; Fatima Belal v. Khaled Abdel-Fattah, the court on October
25, 2019, issued the following order:
Having considered the parties’ briefs and the record submitted on appeal,
we conclude that oral argument is unnecessary in this case. See Sup. Ct. R.
18(1). Khaled Abdel-Fattah appeals a decision of the Superior Court (Temple, J.)
denying his motion for summary judgment on the ground that his motion
concerned cases in which a judgment on the merits, in favor of Fatima Belal, had
become final in May 2018. We affirm.
As the appealing party, Abdel-Fattah has the burden of demonstrating
reversible error. Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014). Based upon our
review of the trial court’s order, Abdel-Fattah’s challenges to it, the relevant law,
and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that he has not demonstrated
reversible error. See id.
Affirmed.
Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ., concurred.
Eileen Fox,
Clerk