2018-0289 Nonprecedential Processed

Joseph S. Haas v. Town of Boscawen

Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Filed January 31, 2019

Opinion text

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

SUPREME COURT

In Case No. 2018-0289, Joseph S. Haas v. Town of
Boscawen, the court on January 31, 2019, issued the following
order:

Having considered the briefs and record submitted on appeal, we conclude
that oral argument is unnecessary in this case. See Sup. Ct. R. 18(1). We affirm.

The plaintiff, Joseph S. Haas, appeals an order of the Superior Court
(Tucker, J.) granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant, the Town of
Boscawen, based upon the parties’ stipulation of facts. He raises numerous
issues in connection with the 2015 and 2016 education property taxes, including
that the warrants were unconstitutional.

As the appealing party, the plaintiff has the burden of demonstrating
reversible error. Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014). Based upon our
review of the trial court’s well-reasoned order, the plaintiff’s challenges to it, the
relevant law, and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that the plaintiff
has not demonstrated reversible error. See id.

Affirmed.

Lynn, C.J., and Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ.,
concurred.

Eileen Fox,
Clerk

Semantically similar Other opinions on related ground

Ranked by cosine-distance similarity of voyage-law-2 embeddings — these read closest to this opinion's legal subject matter, not just by keyword overlap.

Docket Court Filed Disposition Case
2022-0326 N.H. 2023-01-30 Joe S. Haas, Jr. v. Merrimack Valley School District - SAU 46 & a.
2020-0325 N.H. 2021-05-13 Joseph S. Haas, Jr. v. Town of Gilmanton
2019-0089 N.H. 2019-09-13 Town of Northumberland v. Arthur Gadwah & a.
2023-0745 N.H. 2024-08-20 David Charles Peterson v. Jeanette Charon & a.
2019-0295 N.H. 2019-10-25 Joseph Sanders Haas, Jr. v. City of Nashua & a.