2018-0160 Nonprecedential Processed

Carlos Santos v. Zenandre Braccio

Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Filed November 28, 2018

Opinion text

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

SUPREME COURT

In Case No. 2018-0160, Carlos Santos v. Zenandre Braccio,
the court on November 28, 2018, issued the following order:

Having considered the brief and limited record submitted on appeal, we
conclude that oral argument is unnecessary in this case. See Sup. Ct. R. 18(1).
We affirm.

The defendant, Zenandre Braccio, appeals the order of the Circuit Court
(Quigley, J.) entering a default judgment for the plaintiff, Carlos Santos, for the
defendant’s failure to appear for a small claim hearing.

On appeal, the defendant argues that the trial court erred in entering
judgment against him because, he alleges, he did not receive timely, proper
notice of the hearing. He further argues that, if the trial court heard the case
on its merits, he would prevail. The defendant asserts that he raised these
issues in the trial court in his request for a new trial, motion to amend, and
motion to reconsider, all of which the court denied.

It is the burden of the appealing party, here the defendant, to provide this
court with a record sufficient to decide his issues on appeal, as well as to
demonstrate that he raised his issues in the trial court. Bean v. Red Oak Prop.
Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004); see also In the Matter of Birmingham &
Birmingham, 154 N.H. 51, 56 (2006) (self-represented litigants are bound by the
same procedural rules that govern parties represented by counsel). In this case,
the defendant has failed to provide copies of his request for a new trial, motion
to amend, or motion to reconsider. The appellate record consists solely of the
trial court’s notice of decision. Because the defendant has failed to provide a
record sufficient to decide his issues and to demonstrate that he raised them in
the trial court, we decline to address them on appeal. See id. at 250-51.

The issues raised in the defendant’s notice of appeal but not addressed
in his brief are waived. See Brunelle v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 161 N.H. 64, 69
(2010).

Affirmed.

Lynn, C.J., and Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ.,
concurred.

Eileen Fox,
Clerk