Cited by

[¶17] Resolving this issue requires the interpretation of deeds, which presents a question of law that we review de novo.

The proper interpretation of a deed is a question of law for this court.

White v. Auger, 171 N.H. 660, 665 (2019) (“[W]e will not address arguments that a party has not sufficiently developed in its brief.”).

5 These arguments require us to interpret the deeds in this case, a question of law which we review de novo.

Mgmt., 151 N.H. 248, 250 (2004) (burden on appealing party to provide this court with record sufficient to decide issues raised on appeal), nor sufficiently developed argument to address these issues, and we decline to do so, see White v. Auger, 171 N.H. 660, 665 (2019) (court will not address arguments that a party has not sufficiently developed in its brief).

White v. Auger, 171 N.H. 660, 665 (2019) (“[W]e will not address arguments that a party has not sufficiently developed in its brief.”).

We have reviewed the defendants’ remaining arguments and conclude that they are either insufficiently developed for our review, see White v. Auger, 171 N.H. 660, 665 (2019), or lack merit and warrant no further discussion, see Vogel v. Vogel, 137 N.H. 321, 322 (1993).

Such undeveloped legal argument is insufficient to warrant judicial review.

Insofar as Doe seeks to invoke the trial court’s general equitable jurisdiction to support his position, we conclude that such argument is insufficiently developed for our review.

This argument is not sufficiently developed, and we decline to consider it on appeal.

The interpretation of a deed is a question of law, which we review de novo.

scheme, requiring some form of notice to the person whose reputational interest justifies the public body entering nonpublic session under RSA 91-A:3, II(c) effectuates the Right-to-Know Law’s overall purpose of promoting the “greatest possible public access to the actions, discussions, and records of all 14 public bodies.” RSA 91-A:1; see White v. Auger, 171 N.H. 660, 666 (2019).

The interpretation of a deed is a question of law, which we review de novo.

White v. Auger, 171 N.H. 660, 665 (2019); Douglas v. Douglas, 143 N.H. 419, 429 (1999).