Cited by

v. Dorfsman, 168 N.H. 450, 455 (2015) (explaining that “ripeness relates to the degree to which the defined issues in a case are based on actual facts and are capable of being adjudicated on an adequately developed record” (quotation and brackets omitted)).

v. Dorfsman, 168 N.H. 450, 454 (2015) (“The superior court is a court of general jurisdiction and has authority to entertain actions in equity where there is no adequate remedy at law.” (quotation omitted)).

v. Dorfsman, 168 N.H. 450, 455 (2015) (quotation and brackets omitted).

v. Dorfsman, 168 N.H. 450, 455 (2015) (quotation and brackets omitted).

v. Dorfsman, 168 N.H. 450, 454, 130 A.3d 1219 (2015); see also Benoit, 169 N.H. at 20, 139 A.3d 1134 ("The court has broad and flexible equitable powers which allow it to shape and adjust the precise relief to the requirements of the particular situation."

v. Dorfsman, 168 N.H. 450, 454 (2015); see also Benoit, 169 N.H. at 20 (“The court has broad and flexible equitable powers which allow it to shape and adjust the precise relief to the requirements of the particular situation.” (quotation omitted)).

v. Dorfsman, 168 N.H. 450, (2015) (superior court is a court of general jurisdiction with authority over actions in equity).

v. Dorfsman, 168 N.H. 450, 453 (2015) (reviewing de novo the question of whether a court had jurisdiction to consider a university’s appeal of an arbitration decision).

v. Dorfsman, 168 N.H. 450, 455 (2015) (quotation and brackets omitted).