Cited by

Lessard v. 4 Bartlett v. Commerce Ins.

“The fundamental goal of interpreting an insurance policy, as in all contracts, is to carry out the intent of the contracting parties.” Bartlett v. Commerce Ins.

“The fundamental goal of interpreting an insurance policy, as in all contracts, is to carry out the intent of the contracting parties.” Bartlett v. Commerce Ins.

“The fundamental goal of interpreting an insurance policy, as in all contracts, is to carry out the intent of the contracting parties.” Bartlett v. Commerce Ins.

Co., 167 N.H. 521, 531 (2015) (explaining that we will construe an ambiguity against the insurer only “[i]f one of the reasonable meanings of the language favors the policyholder” (quotation omitted)).

In New Hampshire, “[t]he fundamental goal of interpreting an insurance policy, as in all contracts, is to carry out the intent of the contracting parties.” Bartlett v. Commerce Ins.

Co., 167 N.H. ___, ___, 114 A.3d 724, 736 (2015) (declining to decide issue in the first instance), we will address this issue because it involves the statutory authority of the ZBA, which is a question of law.