Cited by

Lennartz v. Oak Point Assocs., 167 N.H. 459, 462 (2015); see also Huckins v. McSweeney, 166 N.H. 176, 181 (2014) (asserting that Part I, Article 14 “is basically an equal protection clause in that it implies that all litigants similarly situated may appeal to the courts both for relief and for defense under like conditions and with like protection and without d

Security, 118 N.H. 673, 678 (1978) (adopting Supreme Court’s balancing test); Lennartz v. Oak Point Assocs., 167 N.H. 459, 462-63 (2015) (referring to the rational basis test, intermediate scrutiny, and strict scrutiny standards by which courts review equal protection challenges and explaining the intermediate scrutiny standard in detail).

Lennartz v. Oak Point Assocs., 167 N.H. 459, 464 (2015) (“[N]either passing reference to constitutional claims nor off-hand invocations of constitutional rights without support by legal argument or authority warrants extended consideration.” (quotation omitted)).

“The equal protection guarantee is essentially a direction that all persons similarly situated should be treated alike.” Lennartz v. Oak Point Assocs., 167 N.H. 459, 462 (2015) (quotation omitted).

Lennartz v. Oak Point Assocs., 167 N.H. 459, 464 (2015).

Lennartz v. Oak Point Assocs., P.A., 167 N.H. 459, 464 (2015) (explaining that judicial review is not warranted for complaints regarding adverse rulings without developed legal argument).

Lennartz v. Oak Point Associates, P.A., 167 N.H. 459, 464 (2015).

Lennartz v. Oak Point Associates, P.A.

As we have explained, “Judicial review is not warranted for complaints regarding adverse rulings without developed legal 11 argument, and neither passing reference to constitutional claims nor off-hand invocations of constitutional rights without support by legal argument or authority warrants extended consideration.” Lennartz v. Oak Point Assocs., 167 N.H. 459, 464 (2015) (quotation omitted).

We have reviewed the husband’s remaining arguments and conclude that they are insufficiently developed for our review, see Lennartz v. Oak Point Assocs., 167 N.H. 459, 464 (2015), or that they do not otherwise warrant further discussion, see Vogel v. Vogel, 137 N.H. 321, 322 (1993).

Lennartz v. Oak Point Assocs., 167 N.H. 459, 464 (2015) (stating every person is presumed to know the law); cf. Barberic, 669 F. Supp. at 993 (stating no evidence employee was aware of supervisor’s unexpressed intent to grant hearing if requested).

Lennartz v. Oak Point Assocs., 167 N.H. 459, 464 (2015).

Lennartz v. Oak Point Associates, 167 N.H. ___, ___, 112 A.3d 1159, 1162 (2015) (stating RSA 508:4–b does not violate equal protection by barring accrued cause of action without application of the discovery rule).