Cited by
Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Diana Camire v. The Gunstock Area Commission, 166 N.H. 374.
-
State of New Hampshire v. Shane M. Beattie & a.
N.H. 2025
Camire v. Gunstock Area Comm’n, 166 N.H. 374, 376 (2014).
-
In re Guardianship of J.H.
2024 N.H. 3
N.H. 2024
Camire v. Gunstock Area Comm’n, 166 N.H. 374, 377 (2014).
-
State of New Hampshire v. Jonathan A. Perfetto
N.H. 2023
Camire v. Gunstock Area Comm’n, 166 N.H. 374, 377 (2014) (citation omitted).
-
State v. David J. Widi, Jr.
166 A.3d 1105
N.H. 2017
To the contrary, “preservation is a limitation on the parties to an appeal and not the reviewing court,” Camire v. Gunstock Area Comm’n, 166 N.H. 374, 377 (2014), and therefore, the State’s failure to raise the issue is not determinative of whether we may review the defendant’s petition and the record to evaluate whether he is entitled to coram nobis relief.
-
Elizabeth Skrekas & a. v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company & a.
N.H. 2017
“[P]reservation is a limitation on the parties to an appeal and not the reviewing court.” Camire v. Gunstock Area Comm’n, 166 N.H. 374, 377 (2014).
-
State v. Arthur Kardonsky
144 A.3d 58
N.H. 2016
Camire v. Gunstock Area Comm’n, 166 N.H. 374, 377 (2014).
-
James Yager v. K. William Clauson & a.
139 A.3d 1127
N.H. 2016
Camire v. Gunstock Area Comm’n, 166 N.H. 374, 376 (2014).
-
John Farrelly v. City of Concord & A
130 A.3d 548
N.H. 2015
“In reviewing the trial court’s grant of summary judgment, we consider the affidavits and other evidence, and all inferences properly drawn from them, in the light most favorable to the non-moving party.” Camire v. Gunstock Area Comm’n, 166 N.H. 374, 376 (2014) (quotation omitted).
-
Miroslav Zecevic v. US Bank National Association, as Trustee, & a.
N.H. 2015
Camire v. Gunstock Area Comm’n, 166 N.H. 374, 376 (2014).
-
JMJ Properties, LLC v. Town of Auburn
168 N.H. 127
N.H. 2015
Camire v. Gunstock Area Comm’n, 166 N.H. 374, 377 (2014).
-
Jennifer Pike v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee
168 N.H. 40
N.H. 2015
Camire v. Gunstock Area Comm’n, 166 N.H. 374, 376 (2014).
-
State of New Hampshire v. Amy Kathleen Mouser
168 N.H. 19
N.H. 2015
Camire v. Gunstock Area Comm’n, 166 N.H. 374, 377 (2014).
-
George C. Conkey, II v. Town of Dorchester
N.H. 2015
“In reviewing the trial court’s grant of summary judgment, we consider the affidavits and other evidence, and all inferences properly drawn from them, in the light most favorable to the non-moving party.” Camire v. Gunstock Area Comm’n, 166 N.H. 374, 376 (2014) (quotation omitted).
-
Brady Sullivan Millworks, LLC v. Lifeshare Liquidation Company, Inc. & a.
N.H. 2015
Camire v. Gunstock Area Comm’n, 166 N.H. 374, 377 (2014).
-
Ingram v. Drouin
111 A.3d 1104
N.H. 2015
Camire v. Gunstock Area Comm’n, 166 N.H. 374, 376 (2014).
-
Richard Holt & a. v. Gary Keer & a. Gary Keer & a. v. Richard Holt & a.
167 N.H. 232
N.H. 2015
This requirement reflects the general policy that “trial forums should have an opportunity to rule on issues and to correct errors before they are presented to the appellate court.” Camire v. Gunstock Area Comm’n, 166 N.H. 374, 377 (2014) (quotation omitted).