Cited by

“In reviewing the trial court’s grant of a motion to dismiss, our standard of review is whether the allegations in plaintiff’s pleadings are reasonably susceptible of a construction that would permit recovery.” Plaisted v. LaBrie, 165 N.H. 194, 195 (2013).

Analysis “In reviewing the trial court’s grant of a motion to dismiss, our standard of review is whether the allegations in plaintiff’s pleadings are reasonably susceptible of a construction that would permit recovery.” Plaisted v. LaBrie, 165 N.H. 194, 195 (2013).

“In reviewing the trial court’s grant of a motion to dismiss, our standard of review is whether the allegations in the [non-moving party’s] pleadings are reasonably susceptible of a construction that would permit recovery.” Plaisted v. LaBrie, 165 N.H. 194, 195 (2013).

In reviewing the trial court’s grant of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, our standard of review is whether the allegations in the complaint are reasonably susceptible of a construction that would permit recovery.

In reviewing the trial court’s grant of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, our standard of review is whether the allegations in the plaintiffs’ pleadings are reasonably susceptible to a construction that would permit recovery.

Our standard of review of the trial court’s grant of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is whether the factual allegations in the plaintiff’s complaint are reasonably susceptible of a construction that would permit recovery.

In reviewing the trial court’s grant of a motion to dismiss, our standard of review is whether the allegations in the plaintiff’s pleadings are reasonably susceptible of a construction that would permit recovery.

In reviewing a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, we assume the truth of the facts alleged by the plaintiffs and construe all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to them.

In reviewing the court’s grant of the motion to dismiss, our standard of review is whether the allegations in Dowgiert’s pleadings are reasonably susceptible of a construction that would permit recovery.

timely file suit was “due to the undisputed failure of a State of New Hampshire entity to provide to her public record information required by law.” In reviewing the trial court’s grant of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, our standard of review is whether the allegations in the petitioner’s pleadings are reasonably susceptible of a construction that would permit recovery.

In reviewing the trial court’s grant of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, our standard of review is whether the allegations in the petitioner’s pleadings are reasonably susceptible of a construction that would permit recovery.

Plaisted v. LaBrie, 165 N.H. 194, 195 (2013) (stating standard of review for motion to dismiss).

e trial court erred by failing to enter a decree pro confesso pursuant to Probate Division Rule 131 and a default judgment “against Financial Freedom, its agent and its assigns.” In reviewing the trial court’s grant of a motion to dismiss, our standard of review is whether the allegations in the petitioner’s pleadings are reasonably susceptible of a construction that would permit recovery.

In reviewing the trial court’s grant of a motion to dismiss, we consider whether the allegations in the plaintiff’s pleadings are reasonably susceptible of a construction that would permit recovery.