DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite In Re Brownell, 44 A.3d 534.

14 citing documents.

  • Appeal of Girard Conti N.H. 2025
    In the Matter of Brownell & Brownell, 163 N.H. 593, 597-98 (2012).
  • In the Matter of Nadeau & Nadeau 2024 N.H. 68 N.H. 2024
    In the Matter of Brownell & Brownell, 163 N.H. 593, 600 (2012).
  • In the Matter of Robert Pizani, Jr. and Dayana Pizani N.H. 2024
    In the Matter of Brownell & Brownell, 163 N.H. 593, 600 (2012).
  • In the Matter of Wendy Mispel-John and Robert John N.H. 2020
    She argues that the purpose of the order was to prevent the parties from squandering or concealing assets or otherwise making it impossible for the court to equitably divide the marital estate, see In the Matter of Brownell & Brownell, 163 N.H. 593, 600 (2012), and that the court should have sanctioned the husband for his conduct.
  • In the Matter of Sean Braunstein and Jericka Braunstein N.H. 2020
    The issue in Rose was whether a state court had jurisdiction “to hold a disabled veteran in contempt for failing to pay child support” when federal veterans’ disability benefits were his “only means of satisfying [that] obligation.” Rose, 481 U.S. at 621-22; see In the Matter of Brownell & Brownell, 163 N.H. 593, 598 (2012).
  • In the Matter of Raymond Hayes and Nisha Hayes N.H. 2020
    In the Matter of Brownell & Brownell, 163 N.H. 593, 600-01 (2012) (holding that, because the purpose of RSA 458:16-a is to achieve equity, trial court has authority to include property in marital estate that has been wrongfully dissipated by a party).
  • In the Matter of Tanya Bourgeois and Michael Cook N.H. 2018
    In the Matter of Brownell & Brownell, 163 N.H. 593, 602 (2012) (no plain error when no error).
  • State v. Lorraine P. Lanciaux N.H. 2018
    In the Matter of Brownell & Brownell, 163 N.H. 593, 601 (2012) (describing trial court’s civil contempt power).
  • In the Matter of Edward Fallon and Ganna Fallon N.H. 2018
    “If the court’s findings can reasonably be made on the evidence presented, they will stand.” In the Matter of Brownell & Brownell, 163 N.H. 593, 596 (2012) (quotation omitted).
  • In the Matter of Giovanni Santiago and Meghan Morrissey N.H. 2017
    In the Matter of Brownell & Brownell, 163 N.H. 593, 602 (2012) (describing plain error rule).
  • In the Matter of James Hatzos and Lisa Hatzos N.H. 2016
    In the Matter of Brownell & Brownell, 163 N.H. 593, 596 (2012).
  • In the Matter of Greydon Colby and Alicia Colby N.H. 2015
    In the Matter of Brownell & Brownell, 163 N.H. 593, 596 (2012).
  • In the Matter of Susan Spenard and David Spenard 167 N.H. 1 N.H. 2014
    A trial court has broad discretion in fashioning a final decree of divorce, In the Matter of Brownell & Brownell, 163 N.H. 593, 596 (2012), and in managing the proceedings before it, In the Matter of Sawyer & Sawyer, 161 N.H. 11, 18 (2010).
  • Randall v. Abounaja 62 A.3d 815 N.H. 2013
    To find plain error: “(1) there must be an error; (2) the error must be plain; (3) the error must affect substantial rights; and (4) the error must seriously affect the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” In the Matter of Brownell & Brownell, 163 N.H. 593, 602 (2012) (quotation omitted).