Cited by

O’Hearne v. McClammer, 163 N.H. 430, 439 (2012) (concluding that an issue first raised in a post-trial response to an objection to a motion for reconsideration was not timely).

Boundary by acquiescence is established when a party proves that: (1) parties are adjoining landowners; (2) who have occupied their respective lots up to a certain boundary; (3) which they have recognized as the true boundary separating the lots; and (4) have done so for at least twenty 10 years.

To establish a boundary by acquiescence, a party must prove that the parties: (1) are adjoining landowners; (2) have occupied their respective lots up to a certain boundary; (3) have recognized that boundary as the true boundary separating the lots; and (4) have done so for at least twenty years.

Boundaries may be established by acquiescence where the parties have recognized a certain boundary as being the true one and have occupied their respective lots accordingly for twenty years or more.

“Issues must be raised at the earliest possible time, because trial forums should have a full opportunity to come to sound conclusions and to correct errors in the first instance.” O’Hearne v. McClammer, 163 N.H. 430, 438 (2012) (quotation omitted).

The replication argues that, under California law, inherited property is separate property and not subject to division and that “it is appropriate for the Court to consider the doctrine of ‘Conflict of Laws in the United States’ with regard to [the California real estate], taking into account both California and New Hampshire law.” See O’Hearne v. McClammer, 163 N.H. 430, 438-39 (2012) (stating argument raised for first time in reply to objection to motion for reconsideration not preserved).

“To acquire title to real property by adverse possession, the possessor must show twenty years of adverse, continuous, exclusive and uninterrupted use of the land claimed so as to give notice to the owner that an adverse claim is being made.” O’Hearne v. McClammer, 163 N.H. 430, 435 (2012) (quotation omitted).

“To acquire title to real property by adverse possession, the possessor must show twenty years of adverse, continuous, exclusive and uninterrupted use of the land claimed so as to give notice to the owner that an adverse claim is being made.” O’Hearne v. McClammer, 163 N.H. 430, 435 (2012) (quotation omitted).

“To acquire title to real property by adverse possession, the possessor must show twenty years of adverse, continuous, exclusive and uninterrupted use of the land claimed so as to give notice to the owner that an adverse claim is being made.” O’Hearne v. McClammer, 163 N.H. 430, 435 (2012) (quotation omitted).

“Issues must be raised at the earliest possible time, because trial forums should have a full opportunity to come to sound conclusions and to correct claimed errors in the first instance.” O’Hearne v. McClammer, 163 N.H. 430, 438 (2012) (quotation omitted); see also Transmedia Restaurant Co. v. Devereaux, 149 N.H. 454, 458- 59 (2003) (holding that challenge to trial court’s failure to provide a jury instruction was not preserved by raising issue in post-trial motions).

3 Issues must be raised at the earliest possible time to afford the trial court a full opportunity to come to sound conclusions and to correct claimed errors in the first instance.

To acquire title to real property by adverse possession, the possessor must show twenty years of adverse, continuous, exclusive, and uninterrupted use of the land claimed so as to give notice to the owner that an adverse claim is being made.

Issues must be raised at the earliest possible time because trial forums should have a full opportunity to come to sound conclusions and to correct claimed errors in the first instance.

O’Hearne v. McClammer, 163 N.H. 430, 436 (2012) (noting that we review trial court’s legal rulings de novo).

“We review the trial court’s legal rulings de novo, but defer to its findings of fact if supported by the record.” O’Hearne v. McClammer, 163 N.H. 430, 436 (2012) (quotation omitted).