Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite NEW HAMPSHIRE HEALTH CARE ASS'N v. Governor, 13 A.3d 145.

23 citing documents.

Contoocook Valley Sch. Dist. v. State 2025 N.H. 29 N.H. 2025
New Hampshire Health Care Assoc.
Josh Yokela v. Governor, State of New Hampshire N.H. 2024
The Separation of Powers Clause “is violated only when one branch [of government] usurps an essential power of another.” N.H. Health Care Assoc.
Appeal of New Hampshire Troopers Association & a. N.H. 2022
v. Governor, 161 N.H. 378, 387 (2011); see N.H. CONST. pt.
Anna Carrigan v. New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services & a. N.H. 2021
The plaintiff also argues that in New Hampshire Health Care Association v. Governor, 161 N.H. 378 (2011), we “defined the constitutional power to spend, broadly, to include government spending at lesser, rather than greater, amounts.” New Hampshire Health Care, however, involved a challenge to a specific governmental action and addressed the executive branch’s discretion, under Part II, Article 56 of the New Hamps
In the Matter of Richard McMenamon and Eileen Rispoli N.H. 2021
New Hampshire Health Care Assoc.
Richard Polonsky v. Town of Bedford N.H. 2020
New Hampshire Health Care Assoc.
The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee v. Eugene Dowgiert 145 A.3d 138 N.H. 2016
New Hampshire Health Care Assoc.
Appeal of Dunbarton School District 141 A.3d 1152 N.H. 2016
New Hampshire Health Care Assoc.
Deborah Sumner v. New Hampshire Secretary of State 136 A.3d 101 N.H. 2016
“The constitutionality of a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo.” New Hampshire Health Care Assoc.
New Hampshire Municipal Association & a. v. New Hampshire Department of State & a. N.H. 2015
v. Governor, 161 N.H. 378, 386 (2011) (separation of powers is violated only when one branch of government usurps an essential power of another); Cloutier v. State Milk Control Board, 92 N.H. 199, 201-02 (1942) (“[Q]uestions of law belong to the judiciary for final determination, as a necessary deduction of the required separation of the legis
Doe v. State 111 A.3d 1077 N.H. 2015
New Hampshire Health Care Assoc.
State of New Hampshire v. Shawn Carter 167 N.H. 161 N.H. 2014
New Hampshire Health Care Assoc.
State v. Addison 165 N.H. 381 N.H. 2013
v. Governor, 161 N.H. 378, 386 (2011) (quoting Ferretti *629 v. Jackson, 88 N.H. 296, 299 (1936)).
In re Southern New Hampshire Medical Center 55 A.3d 988 N.H. 2012
“In reviewing a legislative act, we presume it to be constitutional and will not declare it invalid except upon inescapable grounds.” New Hampshire Health Care Assoc.
Phaneuf Funeral Home v. Little Giant Pump Co. 48 A.3d 912 N.H. 2012
New Hampshire Health Care Assoc.
City of Manchester v. Secretary of State 48 A.3d 864 N.H. 2012
As with any statute, we must presume that the Plan is constitutional, and we will not declare it invalid “except upon inescapable grounds.” New Hampshire Health Care Assoc.
DiGaetano v. DiGaetano 50 A.3d 10 N.H. 2012
New Hampshire Health Care Assoc.
Pelkey v. DAN'S CITY USED CARS, INC. 44 A.3d 480 N.H. 2012
New Hampshire Health Care Assoc.
State v. MATTON 42 A.3d 830 N.H. 2012
New Hampshire Health Care Assoc.
Gentry v. Warden, Northern New Hampshire Correctional Facility 37 A.3d 433 N.H. 2012
New Hampshire Health Care *282 Assoc.
State v. Ploof 34 A.3d 563 N.H. 2011
New Hampshire Health Care Assoc.
Ocasio v. Federal Express Corp. 33 A.3d 1139 N.H. 2011
New Hampshire Health Care Assoc.
In Re Opinion of Justices 27 A.3d 859 N.H. 2011
Thus, in reviewing proposed legislation, as when we review an existing statute, “we presume it to be constitutional and will not declare it invalid except upon inescapable grounds.” New Hampshire Health Care Assoc.