Cited by

Corp., 161 N.H. 192, 198-99 (2010) (upholding finding of breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing based upon defendant’s refusal to timely close on transaction thereby allowing the agreement to expire).

Corp., 161 N.H. 192, 197 (2010) (explaining that the parties’ intentions at the time of a contract’s formation may be inferred from 4 the parties’ actions after the contract was executed).

Corp., 161 N.H. 192, 199 (2010) (“The requirement that a party demonstrate harm to maintain a legal challenge rests upon the constitutional principle that the judicial power ordinarily does not include the power to issue advisory opinions.” (citation omitted)); cf. Watson, 44 A.3d at 137 (construing provision in Rhode Island Constitution

There is “not merely one rule of implied good faith duty in New Hampshire’s law of contract, but a series of doctrines, each of them speaking in terms of an obligation of good faith but serving markedly different functions.” Id.; see Birch Broad, v. Capitol Broad.