Cited by

In the Matter of Sawyer & Sawyer, 161 N.H. 11, 16 (2010).

In the Matter of Sawyer & Sawyer, 161 N.H. 11, 17 (2010) (defendant cannot prevail on due process claim absent showing of actual prejudice).

In the Matter of Sawyer & Sawyer, 161 N.H. 11, 17 (2010).

In the Matter of Sawyer & Sawyer, 161 N.H. 11, 14-15 (2010).

Vincent v. MacLean, 166 N.H. 132, 137 (2014) (stating that plaintiff failed to show prejudice to establish due process violation based upon inability to admit exhibits or adequately question defendant because he did not identify additional documents he wished to submit or present substance of any questions he would have posed to the defendant); In the Matter of Sawyer & Sawyer, 161 N.H. 11, 17 (2010) (stating defendant failed to establish actual prejudice due to domestic violence petition’s lack

“The trial court has broad discretion in managing the proceedings before it.” In the Matter of Sawyer & Sawyer, 161 N.H. 11, 18 (2010) (quotation omitted).

In the Matter of Sawyer & Sawyer, 161 N.H. 11, 18 (2010).

Moreover, we defer to the trial court on matters such as “resolving conflicts in the testimony, measuring the credibility of witnesses, and determining the weight to be given evidence.” In the Matter of Sawyer & Sawyer, 161 N.H. 11, 18 (2010).

Moreover, we defer to the trial court on matters such as “resolving conflicts in the testimony, measuring the credibility of witnesses, and determining the weight to be given evidence.” In the Matter of Sawyer & Sawyer, 161 N.H. 11, 18 (2010).

Moreover, we defer to the trial court on matters such as “resolving conflicts in the testimony, measuring the credibility of witnesses, and determining the weight to be given evidence.” In the Matter of Sawyer & Sawyer, 161 N.H. 11, 18 (2010).

We will not overturn that decision unless it constitutes an unsustainable exercise of discretion, id., and the party seeking the continuance “demonstrates that the decision [is] clearly unreasonable to the prejudice of [her] case.” In the Matter of Sawyer & Sawyer, 161 N.H. 11, 18 (2010) (quotation omitted).

“The trial court has broad discretion in managing the proceedings before it.” In the Matter of Sawyer & Sawyer, 161 N.H. 11, 18 (2010) (quotation omitted).

However, we defer to the trial court on matters such as “resolving conflicts in the testimony, measuring the credibility of witnesses, and determining the weight to be given evidence.” In the Matter of Sawyer & Sawyer, 161 N.H. 11, 18 (2010).

A trial court has broad discretion in fashioning a final decree of divorce, In the Matter of Brownell & Brownell, 163 N.H. 593, 596 (2012), and in managing the proceedings before it, In the Matter of Sawyer & Sawyer, 161 N.H. 11, 18 (2010).

In the Matter of Sawyer & Sawyer, 161 N.H. 11, 18 (2010).

ffs apartment “unannounced and without prior consent,” that he “is left wondering when the incidents might have occurred.” Neither the statute nor our case law requires the plaintiff to provide the specific dates upon which the prohibited acts occurred; rather, the statute requires “2 or more acts over a period of time, however short.” RSA 633:3-a, 11(a); cf. In the Matter of Sawyer & Sawyer, 161 N.H. 11, 16 (2010) (noting that while our case law “mandate[s] that the misconduct prompting a d

“The trial court has broad discretion in managing the proceedings before it.” In the Matter of Sawyer & Sawyer, 161 N.H. 11, 18 (2010) (quotation omitted).