Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., P.C., 7 A.3d 1284.

46 citing documents.

Michael L. McLaughlin v. J. Martin McLaughlin N.H. 2025
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711-12 (2010).
BDP Holdings, LLC v. The Eideard Group, LLC & a. N.H. 2025
Id.; see also Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 713 (2010).
John Doe v. New Hampshire Division of State Police & a. N.H. 2024
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711-12 (2010).
Emmanuel Evariste v. Superintendent, Strafford County Department of Corrections & a. N.H. 2024
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010).
Wescott v. Warden, N.H. State Prison 2024 N.H. 56 N.H. 2024
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711-12 (2010).
Richards v. Union Leader Corp. 2024 N.H. 49 N.H. 2024
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711-12 (2010).
P.A. & a. N.H. 2023
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 712 (2010).
Andrew Szewczyk & a. v. Continental Paving, Inc. & a. N.H. 2023
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010).
Larissa Troy v. Bishop Guertin High School & a. N.H. 2023
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 713 (2010).
Dan Hynes v. New Hampshire Democratic Party & a. N.H. 2023
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010).
Daniel J. Barufaldi v. City of Dover N.H. 2022
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010).
State of New Hampshire v. Volodymyr Zhukovskyy N.H. 2021
State v. Korean Methodist Church of N.H., 157 N.H. 254, 257 (2008) (affirming trial court’s refusal to hold evidentiary hearing when party requesting hearing failed to allege sufficient facts on which it could prevail); Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711-12 (2010) (affirming trial court’s decision not to hold an evidentiary hearing on defendant’s motion to dismiss when “the issues before the trial court were limited to legal analysis of the facts asserted by the plaintiff”).
Clifford E. Avery v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Corrections N.H. 2020
Alward v. Johnston, 171 N.H. 574, 576 (2018); see New England Backflow v. Gagne, 172 N.H. 655, 658 (2019); see also Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010) (holding that, in ruling on a motion to dismiss, the trial court may consider, among other things, “documents attached to the plaintiff’s pleadings”).
Petition of New Hampshire Division for Children, Youth and Families N.H. 2020
The discovery rule “is designed to provide relief in situations where the plaintiff is unaware of either [her] injury or that the injury was caused by a wrongful act or omission.” Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 713 (2010) 3 (quotation omitted).
Mentis Sciences, Inc. v. Pittsburgh Networks, LLC N.H. 2020
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010).
Balzotti Global Group, LLC & a. v. Shepherds Hill Proponents, LLC & a. N.H. 2020
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 713 (2010).
In the Matter of Ginger Allen and William Allen N.H. 2020
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010).
In the Matter of Judith Zecchino and Richard Zecchino N.H. 2020
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010).
Kenneth T. Riso & a. v. Gregory R. Riso & a. 210 A.3d 879 N.H. 2019
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 712 (2010).
James H. Daneau v. Harmon Law Offices, P.C. N.H. 2019
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010).
Paul Ranberg v. The Bank of New York Mellon N.H. 2019
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010).
Nicole Alward v. Emery Johnston, M.D. & a. 199 A.3d 1190 N.H. 2018
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010) (holding that, in ruling on a motion to dismiss, the trial court may consider, among other things, “documents attached to the plaintiff’s pleadings”); DiFruscia v. N.H. Dept. of Pub.
GRAND SUMMIT HOTEL CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS' ASSOCIATION v. L.B.O. HOLDING, INC. D/B/A Attitash Mountain Resort 195 A.3d 514 N.H. 2018
Dismissal is appropriate “[i]f the facts pled do not constitute a basis for legal relief.” Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010) (quotation omitted).
David Eldridge & a. v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC & a. N.H. 2017
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 713 (2010) (quotations and citations omitted).
Joseph W. Chalifoux v. Jennifer M. Chalifoux & a. N.H. 2017
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010).
Mohammed Abdallah Omran v. Andrew Schulman N.H. 2017
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010).
Beverly A. Cluff-Landry v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Manchester 156 A.3d 147 N.H. 2017
She asserts that her cause of action “did not begin to accrue until at least June 15, 2012 when she was separated from work, and therefore she timely filed her claim on May 13, 2015.” “Statutes of limitation place a limit on the time in which a plaintiff may bring suit after a cause of action accrues.” Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 712 (2010) (quotation and ellipsis omitted).
Michael Askenaizer, as Trustee of Chapter 7 Estate of Focus Capital, Inc. v. Foy Insurance Group, Inc. & … N.H. 2017
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 712 (2010).
Robert McNamara v. New Hampshire Retirement System N.H. 2017
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010).
John D. Tucker, Jr. v. Jean A. Tucker & a. N.H. 2017
atter of Aube & Aube, 158 N.H. 459, 464 (2009) (holding that final divorce decree is judgment subject to post-judgment interest); (2) even if his action were governed by RSA 508:4 (2010), which establishes a three-year statute of limitations for personal actions, the plaintiff failed to carry his burden to demonstrate that the limitations period should be tolled, see Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 713 (2010) (stating plaintiff has burden of establishing that discovery rule applies),
Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP 388 P.3d 834 Ariz. Ct. App. 2017
Gregory Gould & a. v. Northern Human Services & a. N.H. 2016
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010).
Brian Goodman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. N.H. 2016
Bean v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010).
Ed's Carpet, Tile, and Hardwood, Inc. v. Marshall Law Office N.H. 2016
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010).
Agha S. Ahmad v. Federal National Mortgage Association N.H. 2015
Bean v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010).
Scott Kukesh & a. v. Beverly P. Mutrie, Individually and as Trustee of the Beverly P. Mutrie Revocable … 168 N.H. 76 N.H. 2015
RSA 507:8-h; see Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010) (stating that when deciding motion to dismiss, the “trial court need not accept allegations in the writ that are merely conclusions of law” (quotation omitted)).
Susan Chase Gage, of the Estate of Margaret C. Gage v. State of New Hampshire N.H. 2015
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 712 (2010).
James Conant & a. v. Timothy O'Meara & a. 167 N.H. 644 N.H. 2015
“Statutes of limitation place a limit on the time in which a plaintiff may bring suit after a cause of action accrues.” Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 712 (2010) (quotation and ellipses omitted).
Ojo v. Lorenzo 64 A.3d 974 N.H. 2013
documents the authenticity of which are not disputed by the parties[,] official public records[,] or documents sufficiently referred to in the [writ].” Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010) (citation, quotation, and ellipses omitted).
Professional Fire Fighters v. Town of Wolfeboro 48 A.3d 900 N.H. 2012
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010).
MBAHABA v. Morgan 44 A.3d 472 N.H. 2012
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010).
Surprenant v. MULCRONE 44 A.3d 465 N.H. 2012
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010).
In Re Guardianship of Raymond B. 44 A.3d 582 N.H. 2012
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010).
Lamprey v. Britton Construction, Inc. 37 A.3d 359 N.H. 2012
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 711 (2010).
Best Choice Fund, LLC v. Low & Childers, P.C. 269 P.3d 678 Ariz. Ct. App. 2012
J & M Lumber & Construction Co. v. Smyjunas 20 A.3d 947 N.H. 2011
The rule has two prongs that must be satisfied: “First, a plaintiff must know or reasonably should have known that it has been injured; and second, a plaintiff must know or reasonably should have known that its injury was proximately caused by conduct of the defendant.” Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., 160 N.H. 708, 713 (2010) (quotation omitted).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by