Cited by

Sutton v. Town of Gilford, 160 N.H. 43, 55 (2010).

Sutton v. Town of Gilford, 160 N.H. 43, 58 (2010).

Sutton v. Town of Gilford, 160 N.H. 43, 55 (2010).

“When a statute’s language is plain and unambiguous, we need not examine its legislative history.” Sutton v. Town of Gilford, 160 N.H. 43, 54 (2010).

Sutton v. Town of Gilford, 160 N.H. 43, 58 (2010).

The doctrine of municipal estoppel is an equitable doctrine that has been applied to municipalities “to prevent unjust enrichment and to accord fairness to those who bargain with the agents of municipalities for the promises of the municipalities.” Sutton v. Town of Gilford, 160 N.H. 43, 58 (2010) (quotation omitted).

Based upon the technical meaning of the terms “intranet” and “internet,” we hold that use of SPS’s intranet network constitutes use of an “internet service” within the meaning of RSA 649-B:4, I. We decline the defendant’s invitation to examine the statute’s legislative history because “we find nothing ambiguous about the statutory language.” Sutton v. Town of Gilford, 160 N.H. 43, 55 (2010).

Sutton v. Town of Gilford, 160 N.H. 43, 55 (2010).

Sutton v. Town of Gilford, 160 N.H. 43, 55 (2010).

Sutton v. Town of Gilford, 160 N.H. 43, 61 (2010).

erroneous as a matter of law or unsupported by the evidence.” Great Lakes Aircraft Co. v. City of Claremont, 135 N.H. 270, 287 (1992) (quotations omitted); see Sutton v. Town of Gilford, 160 N.H. 43, 55 (2010).

Sutton v. Town of Gilford, 160 N.H. 43, 55 (2010).

Sutton v. Town of Gilford, 160 N.H. 43, 58 (2010) (acknowledging that municipal estoppel is an equitable doctrine and setting forth the elements thereof).

The respondents read Sutton v. Toum of Gilford, 160 N.H. 43 (2010), to overrule our prior cases and to establish that the only way lots can be merged is when “either the present or former owners [apply] to the local planning board for a voluntary merger or the lots [are] merged pursuant to a local ordinance specifying the conditions of merger.” In Sutton, however, we addresse

Sutton v. Town of Gilford, 160 N.H. 43, 54 (2010) (“When a statute’s language is plain and unambiguous, we need not examine its legislative history.”).

Sutton v. Town of Gilford, 160 N.H. 43, 52 (2010).

Sutton v. Town of Gilford, 160 N.H. 43, 57 (2010).

Sutton v. Town of Gilford, 160 N.H. 43, 54 (2010).

Sutton v. Town of Gilford, 160 N.H. 43, 55 (2010).

Sutton v. Town of Gilford, 160 N.H. 43, 58 (2010) (elements of municipal estoppel require factual determinations that will be upheld unless unsupported by evidence or legally erroneous); Cardinal Dev.