DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite State Employees Ass'n Local 1984 v. New Hampshire Division of Personnel, 965 A.2d 1116.

16 citing documents.

  • John C. Rankin & a. v. South Street Downtown Holdings, Inc. South Street Downtown Holdings, Inc. v. TruexCullins … N.H. 2019
    of N.H. v. N.H. Div. of Personnel, 158 N.H. 338, 345 (2009) (quotations and brackets omitted).
  • N.C. v. New Hampshire Board of Psychologists New Hampshire Board of Psychologists v. Alethea E. Young, Ph.D. 169 N.H. 361 N.H. 2016
    of N.H. v. N.H. Div. of Personnel, 158 N.H. 338, 345 (2009) (noting the “elementary principle of statutory construction that all of the words of a statute must be given effect and that the legislature is presumed not to have used superfluous or redundant words” (quotation omitted)).
  • Appeal of Carlos Marti 145 A.3d 133 N.H. 2016
    of N.H. v. N.H. Div. of Personnel, 158 N.H. 338, 345 (2009) (quotation omitted), the respondent argues that “[i]f the legislature intended to make RSA 281-A:25-a available to ‘former’ employees in addition to current employees, it would have stated as much in the statute.” Although we acknowledge the use of the term “former employee” in RSA 281-A:8, III, t
  • State v. Timothy Bobola 138 A.3d 519 N.H. 2016
    of N.H. v. N.H. Div. of Personnel, 158 N.H. 338, 345 (2009) (quotation omitted).
  • STIHL, Inc. v. State 126 A.3d 1192 N.H. 2015
    of N.H. v. N.H. Div. of Personnel, 158 N.H. 338, 345 (2009) (noting the “elementary principle of statutory construction that all of the words of a statute must be 4 given effect and that the legislature is presumed not to have used superfluous or redundant words” (quotation omitted)).
  • State v. Balch 111 A.3d 672 N.H. 2015
    of N.H. v. N.H. Div of Personnel, 158 N.H. 338, 345 (2009).
  • K.L.N. Construction Company, Inc. & a. v. Town of Pelham 167 N.H. 180 N.H. 2014
    of N.H. v. N.H. Div. of Personnel, 158 N.H. 338, 345 (2009) (“[W]here the legislature uses different language in related statutes, we assume that the legislature intended something different.” (quotation omitted)).
  • Petition of David Eskeland 166 N.H. 554 N.H. 2014
    of N.H. v. N.H. Div. of Personnel, 158 N.H. 338, 341 (2009).
  • State v. Blunt 62 A.3d 1285 N.H. 2013
    of N.H. v. N.H. Div. of Personnel, 158 N.H. 338, 343 (2009).
  • Professional Fire Fighters v. Town of Wolfeboro 48 A.3d 900 N.H. 2012
    of N.H. v. N.H. Div. of Personnel, 158 N.H. 338, 345 (2009).
  • Ettinger v. Town of Madison Planning Board 35 A.3d 562 N.H. 2011
    of N.H. v. N.H. Div. of Personnel, 158 N.H. 338, 345 (2009).
  • State Employees' Ass'n v. State 20 A.3d 961 N.H. 2011
    of N.H. v. N.H. Div. of Personnel, 158 N.H. 338, 340 (2009).
  • In re Poulicakos 999 A.2d 246 N.H. 2010
    of N.H. v. N.H. Div. of Personnel, 158 N.H. 338, 346 (2009) (quotation and brackets omitted).
  • Impact Food Sales, Inc. v. Evans 999 A.2d 198 N.H. 2010
    of N.H. v. N.H. Din of Personnel, 158 N.H. 338, 343 (2009) (we will not add language that the legislature did not see fit to include).
  • Coco v. Jaskunas 986 A.2d 531 N.H. 2009
    of N.H. v. N.H. Div. of Personnel, 158 N.H. 338, 343 (2009) (quotation omitted).
  • In Re Guardianship of Williams 986 A.2d 559 N.H. 2009
    of N.H. v. N.H. Div. of Personnel, 158 N.H. 338, 345 (2009) (quotations, citations, and brackets omitted; emphasis added).