Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Lassonde v. Stanton, 956 A.2d 332.

16 citing documents.

  • Dawn Cate & a. v. Linda Hemingway & a. N.H. 2020
    “A breach of contract occurs when there is a failure without legal excuse to perform any promise which forms the whole or part of a contract.” Lassonde v. Stanton, 157 N.H. 582, 588 (2008) (quotation and brackets omitted).
  • S & W Roofing, LLC v. Scott Shepperson N.H. 2020
    Whether a party has sustained damages and the nature and extent thereof are questions of fact for the trial court to determine.
  • Pro Done, Inc. v. Teresa Basham & a. 210 A.3d 192 N.H. 2019
    Under New Hampshire law, “[a] breach of contract occurs when there is a failure without legal excuse to perform any promise which forms the whole or part of a contract.” Lassonde v. Stanton, 157 N.H. 582, 588 (2008) (quotation and brackets omitted).
  • Lorraine MacDonald & a. v. Lisa Jacobs 201 A.3d 1253 N.H. 2019
    matter incompatible with his business, trade, profession, or office”); see also Lassonde v. Stanton, 157 N.H. 582, 592- 93 (2008).
  • Kishan, Inc. & a. v. Margaret L. Jalbert & a. N.H. 2017
    “A breach of contract occurs when there is a failure without legal excuse to perform any promise which forms the whole or part of a contract.” Lassonde v. Stanton, 157 N.H. 582, 588 (2008) (quotation and brackets omitted).
  • In the Matter of Caren Logan and James Logan N.H. 2017
    Lassonde v. Stanton, 157 N.H. 582, 587 (2008) (“Appellate questions not presented in a notice of appeal are generally considered waived by this court.”).
  • Robert Gunderson v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Safety 167 N.H. 215 N.H. 2014
    Lassonde v. Stanton, 157 N.H. 582, 587 (2008) (“Appellate questions not presented in a notice of appeal are generally considered waived by this court.”).
  • In the Matter of the Liquidation of The Home Insurance Company 89 A.3d 165 N.H. 2014
    Tulley v. Sheldon, 159 N.H. 269, 274 (2009) (holding that plaintiffs were entitled to contractual 1.5% prejudgment interest rate rather than statutory rate); Lassonde v. Stanton, 157 N.H. 582, 594 (2008) (holding that plaintiffs were entitled to at least 15% statutory interest where contract provided for 15-18% finance charge per annum on unpaid balances); Mast Rd.
  • Audette v. Cummings 82 A.3d 1269 N.H. 2013
    II “A breach of contract occurs when there is a failure without legal excuse to perform any promise which forms the whole or part of a contract.” Lassonde v. Stanton, 157 N.H. 582, 588 (2008) (quotation omitted).
  • Axenics, Inc. v. Turner Construction Co. 62 A.3d 754 N.H. 2013
    On the other hand, “[a] breach of contract occurs when there is a failure without legal excuse to perform any promise which forms the whole or part of a contract.” Lassonde v. Stanton, 157 N.H. 582, 588 (2008) (quotation and brackets omitted).
  • Progressive Northern Insurance v. Argonaut Insurance 20 A.3d 977 N.H. 2011
    is excess to the Argonaut policy” and that “the ‘other insurance’ clauses of the policies require Progressive and Argonaut to share any coverage on a pro-rata basis.” “Appellate questions not presented in a notice of appeal are generally considered waived by this court.” Lassonde v. Stanton, 157 N.H. 582, 587 (2008).
  • State v. Winward 20 A.3d 338 N.H. 2011
    However, the defendant failed to preserve this issue for our review because he did not adequately raise it before the trial court.
  • In re Canaway 13 A.3d 320 N.H. 2010
    However, the husband failed to preserve this issue for our review because he did not raise it before the trial court.
  • Anna H. Cardone Revocable Trust v. Cardone 8 A.3d 1 N.H. 2010
    Lassonde v. Stanton, 157 N.H. 582, 594 (2008) (lack of precision in contract clause does not create ambiguity).
  • Tulley v. Sheldon 982 A.2d 954 N.H. 2009
    In Lassonde v. Stanton, 157 N.H. 582 (2008), the subject contract included a prejudgment interest rate higher than the statutory rate.
  • State v. Veale 972 A.2d 1009 N.H. 2009
    See, e.g., Lassonde v. Stanton, 157 N.H. 582, 593 (2008) (discussing recovery of damages for harm to reputation without proof of special damages under doctrine of libel per se).