DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite In Re Fulton, 910 A.2d 1180.

14 citing documents.

  • In re S.T. 151 A.3d 522 N.H. 2016
    In the Matter of Fulton & Fulton, 154 N.H. 264, 268 (2006).
  • Appeal of Northridge Environmental, LLC 135 A.3d 945 N.H. 2016
    Finally, we note that “if the legislature disagrees with our construction of its statutory scheme, it is free to amend the statutes as it sees fit.” In the Matter of Fulton & Fulton, 154 N.H. 264, 268 (2006) (quotation omitted).
  • In the Matter of Marcus J. Hampers and Kristin C. Hampers 166 N.H. 422 N.H. 2014
    In the Matter of Fulton & Fulton, 154 N.H. 264, 268 (2006) (holding that gifts are not included in definition of gross income, but that trial courts may consider impact of gifts on financial condition of the parties and that RSA 458-C:5’s special circumstances standard is sufficiently flexible to address issue).
  • In re Woolsey 55 A.3d 977 N.H. 2012
    We are the final arbiters of the legislature’s intent *304 as expressed in the words of the statute considered as a whole.” In the Matter of Fulton & Fulton, 154 N.H. 264, 266 (2006) (quotations and citation omitted).
  • In re LaRocque 53 A.3d 615 N.H. 2012
    In the Matter of Fulton & Fulton, 154 N.H. 264, 266 (2006).
  • In Re Sullivan 982 A.2d 959 N.H. 2009
    “Trial courts have broad discretion in reviewing and modifying child support orders,” and “we will *254 overturn modification orders only if it clearly appears that the trial court engaged in an unsustainable exercise of discretion.” In the Matter of Fulton & Fulton, 154 N.H. 264, 269 (2006) (quotations omitted).
  • Great Traditions Home Builders, Inc. v. O'Connor 949 A.2d 724 N.H. 2008
    If the legislature did not intend this broad application, “it is free to amend the statute[ ] as it sees fit.” In the Matter of Fulton & Fulton, 154 N.H. 264, 268 (2006) (quotation omitted).
  • State v. Njogu 937 A.2d 887 N.H. 2007
    In the Matter of Fulton & Fulton, 154 N.H. 264, 267 (2006).
  • In Re Carr 938 A.2d 89 N.H. 2007
    “When the legislature uses the phrase ‘including, but not limited to’ in a statute, the application of that statute is limited to the types of items therein particularized.” In the Matter of Clark & Clark, 154 N.H. 420, 423 (2006) (citations omitted); see also In the Matter of Fulton & Fulton, 154 N.H. 264, 267 (2006).
  • In Re Larue 934 A.2d 577 N.H. 2007
    If the legislature did not intend this application of contract law to the modification of parental rights and responsibilities, “it is free to amend the statute[ ] as it sees fit.” In the Matter of Fulton & Fulton, 154 N.H. 264, 268 (2006) (quotation omitted).
  • State v. Balukas 924 A.2d 381 N.H. 2007
    In the Matter of Fulton & Fulton, 154 N.H. 264, 267 (2006).
  • In Re Choy 919 A.2d 801 N.H. 2007
    In the Matter of Fulton & Fulton, 154 N.H. 264, 270 (2006).
  • Eldertrust of Florida, Inc. v. Town of Epsom 919 A.2d 776 N.H. 2007
    In the Matter of Fulton & Fulton, 154 N.H. 264, 268 (2006); Town of Derry v. Adams, 121 N.H. 473, 480 (1981).
  • In Re Clark 910 A.2d 1198 N.H. 2006
    We recently held in In the Matter of Fulton & Fulton, 154 N.H. 264, 267 (2006), that the items particularized in RSA 458-C:2, IV share two characteristics.