DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite In re Bazemore, 899 A.2d 225.

22 citing documents.

  • In the Matter of Elizabeth Reid and Bradley Reid; In re Guardianship of C.R. N.H. 2025
    id.; In the Matter of Bazemore & Jack, 153 N.H. 351, 353-56 (2006).
  • Appeal of State of New Hampshire N.H. 2022
    We recognize that, unlike RSA 4:40, I, RSA 273-A:12, II, contains the mandatory language “shall be submitted” and “shall vote.” RSA 273-A:12, II; see In the Matter of Bazemore & Jack, 153 N.H. 351, 354 (2006) (“It is a general rule of statutory construction that.
  • Jane Doe v. Commissioner of the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services N.H. 2021
    In the Matter of Bazemore & Jack, 153 N.H. 351, 354 (2006) (“It is a general rule of statutory construction that.
  • Genworth Life Insurance Company v. New Hampshire Department of Insurance N.H. 2021
    In the Matter of Bazemore & Jack, 153 N.H. 351, 354 (2006) (“It is a general rule of statutory construction that.
  • Appeal of Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC, Appeal of Public Service Company of New Hampshire d/b/a Eversource Energy 186 A.3d 865 N.H. 2018
    In the Matter of Bazemore & Jack, 153 N.H. 351, 354, 899 A.2d 225 (2006); see LLK Trust, 159 N.H. at 736, 992 A.2d 666 (stating that we "will not consider what the legislature might have said or add language that the legislature did not see fit to include").
  • Appeal of James G. Boyle, as Trustee of the 150 Greenleaf Avenue Realty Trust 169 N.H. 371 N.H. 2016
    n this case, under the Driveway Policy, the findings compel incompatible outcomes: the driveway permit “shall be issued” because “the safety of the traveling public can be adequately protected,” and it “shall be denied” because the “proposed driveway will cause an unreasonable hazard to the traveling public.” N.H. Driveway Policy § 7(a), (e) (emphases added); see In the Matter of Bazemore & Jack, 153 N.H. 351, 354 (2006) (“It is a general rule of statutory construction that.
  • In re Muller 62 A.3d 770 N.H. 2013
    In the Matter of Bazemore & Jack, 153 N.H. 351, 353 (2006) (noting a voluntarily unemployed parent did not terminate employment “with the intent of avoiding his child support obligation or thwarting [the other parent’s] ability to receive child support in an appropriate amount”); see also In the Matter of Lynn & Lynn, 158 N.H. 615, 616, 618 (2009) (affirming t
  • In Re Lynn 972 A.2d 1046 N.H. 2009
    In the Matter of Bazemore & Jack, 153 N.H. 351, 354 (2006) (holding that trial court has discretion to impute less than the total difference between the amount the parent is earning and the amount the parent has earned).
  • Lambert v. Belknap County Convention 949 A.2d 709 N.H. 2008
    “It is a general rule of statutory construction that the word ‘may’ is permissive in nature____” In the Matter of Bazemore & Jack, 153 N.H. 351, 354 (2006).
  • Great Traditions Home Builders, Inc. v. O'Connor 949 A.2d 724 N.H. 2008
    In the Matter of Bazemore & Jack, 153 N.H. 351, 354 (2006) (general use of “shall” makes provision mandatory).
  • State v. KOREAN METHODIST CHURCH 949 A.2d 738 N.H. 2008
    “It is a general *257 rule of statutory construction that the word ‘may’ is permissive in nature...” In the Matter of Bazemore & Jack, 153 N.H. 351, 354 (2006).
  • Petition of Kilton 939 A.2d 198 N.H. 2007
    In the Matter of Bazemore & Jack, 153 N.H. 351, 356 (2006).
  • Stankiewicz v. City of Manchester 938 A.2d 873 N.H. 2007
    In the Matter of Bazemore & Jack, 153 N.H. 351, 354 (2006) (generally use of “shall” makes enforcement of the provision mandatory).
  • Auger v. Town of Strafford 931 A.2d 1213 N.H. 2007
    In the Matter of Bazemore & Jack, 153 N.H. 351, 356 (2006).
  • EAST DERRY FIRE PRECINCT v. Nadeau 924 A.2d 390 N.H. 2007
    In the Matter of Bazemore & Jack, 153 N.H. 351, 356 (2006).
  • State v. Balukas 924 A.2d 381 N.H. 2007
    See, e.g., In the Matter of Bazemore & Jack, 153 N.H. 351, 354 (2006).
  • State v. Kepple 922 A.2d 661 N.H. 2007
    In the Matter of Bazemore & Jack, 153 N.H. 351, 356 (2006).
  • McKenzie v. Town of Eaton Zoning Board of Adjustment 917 A.2d 193 N.H. 2007
    In the Matter of Bazemore & Jack, 153 N.H. 351, 354 (2006).
  • McKenzie v. TOWN OF EATON ZONING BD. 917 A.2d 193 N.H. 2007
    In the Matter of Bazemore & Jack, 153 N.H. 351, 354, 899 A.2d 225 (2006).
  • In Re Sarvela 910 A.2d 1214 N.H. 2006
    t a parent is earning and the amount a parent has earned in cases where the parent voluntarily becomes unemployed or underemployed, unless the parent is physically or mentally incapacitated.” We have held that this statute “permitfs], rather than require[s] a court to impute income based upon a voluntarily unemployed or underemployed parent’s prior earnings.” In the Matter of Bazemore & Jack, 153 N.H. 351, 355-56 (2006).
  • State v. McGill 903 A.2d 1016 N.H. 2006
    In the Matter of Bazemore & Jack, 153 N.H. 351, 354, (2006) (stating the general rule of statutory construction that “shall” requires mandatory action and “may” is permissive).
  • In re Rossino 899 A.2d 233 N.H. 2006
    a parent is unemployed or underemployed within the meaning of the statute, RSA 458-C:2, IV(a) sets forth the method the court may, in its discretion, use when calculating the amount of gross income to be imputed to that parent; namely, “the difference between the amount [that] parent is earning and the amount [that] parent has earned.” RSA 458-C:2, IV(a); see In the Matter of Bazemore & Jack, 153 N.H. 351 (2006) (holding that trial court has discretion to impute less than the total differenc